• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康公平网络评估框架培训:在五所健康职业学校开展的一项试点研究

The training for health equity network evaluation framework: a pilot study at five health professional schools.

作者信息

Ross Simone J, Preston Robyn, Lindemann Iris C, Matte Marie C, Samson Rex, Tandinco Filedito D, Larkins Sarah L, Palsdottir Bjorg, Neusy Andre-Jacques

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Anton Breinl Research Centre for Health Systems Strengthening, James Cook University, Australia; Training for Health Equity Network, Belgium, .

出版信息

Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 May-Aug;27(2):116-26. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.143727.

DOI:10.4103/1357-6283.143727
PMID:25420971
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Training for Health Equity Network (THEnet), a group of diverse health professional schools aspiring toward social accountability, developed and pilot tested a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess progress toward socially accountable health professions education. The evaluation framework provides criteria for schools to assess their level of social accountability within their organization and planning; education, research and service delivery; and the direct and indirect impacts of the school and its graduates, on the community and health system. This paper describes the pilot implementation of testing the evaluation framework across five THEnet schools, and examines whether the evaluation framework was practical and feasible across contexts for the purposes of critical reflection and continuous improvement in terms of progress towards social accountability.

METHODS

In this pilot study, schools utilized the evaluation framework using a mixed method approach of data collection comprising of workshops, qualitative interviews and focus group discussions, document review and collation and analysis of existing quantitative data.

RESULTS

The evaluation framework allowed each school to contextually gather evidence on how it was meeting the aspirational goals of social accountability across a range of school activities, and to identify strengths and areas for improvement and development.

DISCUSSION

The evaluation framework pilot study demonstrated how social accountability can be assessed through a critically reflective and comprehensive process. As social accountability focuses on the relationship between health professions schools and health system and health population outcomes, each school was able to demonstrate to students, health professionals, governments, accrediting bodies, communities and other stakeholders how current and future health care needs of populations are addressed in terms of education, research, and service learning.

摘要

背景

健康公平培训网络(THEnet)是一群追求社会问责制的多元化健康专业学校组成的团体,它开发并试点测试了一个综合评估框架,以评估在实现具有社会问责制的健康专业教育方面的进展。该评估框架为学校提供了标准,用于评估其在组织和规划、教育、研究和服务提供以及学校及其毕业生对社区和卫生系统的直接和间接影响方面的社会问责水平。本文描述了在五所THEnet学校试点实施评估框架的情况,并探讨该评估框架在不同背景下对于批判性反思和在社会问责进展方面持续改进是否切实可行。

方法

在这项试点研究中,学校采用混合方法收集数据来使用评估框架,包括举办研讨会、进行定性访谈和焦点小组讨论、审查和整理文件以及分析现有定量数据。

结果

评估框架使每所学校能够根据具体情况收集证据,证明其在一系列学校活动中如何实现社会问责的理想目标,并确定优势以及改进和发展的领域。

讨论

评估框架试点研究展示了如何通过批判性反思和全面的过程来评估社会问责制。由于社会问责制关注健康专业学校与卫生系统及健康人群结果之间的关系,每所学校都能够向学生、健康专业人员、政府、认证机构、社区和其他利益相关者展示如何在教育、研究和服务学习方面满足人群当前和未来的医疗保健需求。

相似文献

1
The training for health equity network evaluation framework: a pilot study at five health professional schools.健康公平网络评估框架培训:在五所健康职业学校开展的一项试点研究
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 May-Aug;27(2):116-26. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.143727.
2
Measuring social accountability in health professional education: development and international pilot testing of an evaluation framework.测量卫生专业教育中的社会问责制:评估框架的制定和国际试点测试。
Med Teach. 2013;35(1):32-45. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.731106. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
3
Building blocks for social accountability: a conceptual framework to guide medical schools.社会问责制的基石:指导医学院校的概念框架
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 26;16(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0741-y.
4
Practice intentions at entry to and exit from medical schools aspiring to social accountability: findings from the Training for Health Equity Network Graduate Outcome Study.医学校园准入和准出阶段的实践意向:卫生公平网络培训毕业生成果研究的发现。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1360-6.
5
Faculty analysis of distributed medical education in Northern Canadian Aboriginal communities.加拿大北部原住民社区分布式医学教育的教员分析
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(4):2664. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
6
Evaluation and assessment of social accountability in medical schools.医学院校的社会责任评价与评估。
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):673-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590253.
7
Building the evidence base: networking innovative socially accountable medical education programs.建立证据基础:创新社会问责医学教育项目的网络建设
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):177. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
8
Social Accountability: A Framework for Medical Schools to Improve the Health of the Populations They Serve.社会问责制:医学院改进服务人群健康的框架。
Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1120-1124. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002239.
9
Impact of selection strategies on representation of underserved populations and intention to practise: international findings.选择策略对服务不足人群的代表性和实践意愿的影响:国际研究结果。
Med Educ. 2015 Jan;49(1):60-72. doi: 10.1111/medu.12518.
10
Exploring a communication curriculum through a focus on social accountability: A case study at a South African medical school.通过关注社会责任感探索沟通课程:南非一所医学院校的案例研究
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018 May 28;10(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1634.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Medical Education Socially Accountable in Australia and Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review.使澳大利亚和东南亚的医学教育具有社会责任感:一项系统综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 25;35(3):1767-1776. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02322-x. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Challenges and Facilitators for Physicians and Medical Schools to Promote Social Accountability in Rural Communities: A Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.医生和医学院校在农村社区促进社会问责制面临的挑战与促进因素:一项范围综述和主题分析
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jun 26;12:23821205251348015. doi: 10.1177/23821205251348015. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Community service rehabilitation therapists' understanding of social accountability.
社区服务康复治疗师对社会责任的理解。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2024 Jun 6;16(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4473.
4
Exploring the development of a framework of social accountability standards for healthcare service delivery: a qualitative multipart, multimethods process.探索制定医疗服务提供的社会问责制标准框架:一个定性的多部分、多方法的过程。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 14;13(9):e073064. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073064.
5
Validity evidence and psychometric evaluation of a socially accountable health index for health professions schools.健康职业院校社会问责健康指数的效度证据与心理测量学评估
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Mar;29(1):147-172. doi: 10.1007/s10459-023-10248-5. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
The Integration of Primary Care and Public Health in Medical Students' Training Based on Social Accountability and Community-Engaged Medical Education.基于社会问责和社区参与医学教育的医学生培训中的初级保健和公共卫生整合。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;68:1605359. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605359. eCollection 2023.
7
Factors affecting social accountability of medical schools in the Korean context: exploratory factor and multiple regression analyses.韩国背景下影响医学院校社会问责制的因素:探索性因素分析与多元回归分析
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2054049. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2054049.
8
Social Justice Education in Dentistry: A Qualitative Analysis and Conceptual Framework.口腔医学中的社会公正教育:定性分析与概念框架。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):123-130. doi: 10.1177/23800844211072778. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
9
Increasing doctors working in specific rural regions through selection from and training in the same region: national evidence from Australia.通过在同一地区选拔和培训来增加在特定农村地区工作的医生:来自澳大利亚的全国证据。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Oct 29;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00678-w.
10
A Curriculum for Achieving Universal Health Care: A Case Study of Ateneo de Zamboanga University School of Medicine.实现全民健康覆盖的课程设置:以阿特尼奥德三宝颜大学医学院为例。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 29;9:612035. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.612035. eCollection 2021.