Mukhopadhyay Amartya, Leong Benjamin S H, Lua Adela, Aroos Rana, Wong Jie Jun, Koh Nicola, Goh Nicholette, See Kay Choong, Phua Jason, Kowitlawakul Yanika
Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar;24(5-6):778-85. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12707. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
To identify the differences in practices and perceptions of handovers between nurses and residents in the critical care setting, so as to improve the quality of the process.
Critically ill patients with complex problems are ideal for the study of handovers. However, few handover studies have been conducted in intensive care units.
Descriptive study using questionnaires.
We interviewed all nurses and residents involved in handovers of patients admitted to and discharged from a medical intensive care unit over a period of one month. Interviews were guided by a questionnaire and conducted between 24-48 hours of handovers.
Out of 672 eligible participants, 580 (290 nurses and 290 residents) agreed to participate in the study (86·3% response rate). Compared to residents, nurses received more training on handovers, covered issues specific to allied health specialties more frequently during handovers, and reviewed patients earlier after handovers. The perceived importance of the different components of handover varied significantly: donor residents, donor nurses, recipient residents and recipient nurses emphasised the overall management plan, case complexity, management plan over the next 48 hours and past medical history, including allergies, respectively. Satisfaction in the handover was related to pre-handover review of electronic medical records, handover training and clarity level in the management plan following the handover, with only the last factor remaining significant on multivariate analysis.
More nurses than residents received prior training in handovers. Nursing handovers were more inclusive of allied health specialties. The perceived importance of the components of handover varied. Greater clarity in management plans was associated with better satisfaction.
Deficiencies in the handover process (lack of prior training in handovers, not including allied health specialties and not reviewing electronic records before handover) were identified, thus providing opportunities for mutual learning between nurses and residents.
识别重症监护环境中护士与住院医师在交接班实践和认知上的差异,以提高交接过程的质量。
患有复杂问题的重症患者是研究交接班的理想对象。然而,在重症监护病房进行的交接班研究很少。
使用问卷的描述性研究。
我们对在一个月内参与某内科重症监护病房患者出入院交接的所有护士和住院医师进行了访谈。访谈以问卷为指导,在交接班后24至48小时内进行。
在672名符合条件的参与者中,580人(290名护士和290名住院医师)同意参与研究(应答率为86.3%)。与住院医师相比,护士接受了更多关于交接班的培训,在交接班期间更频繁地涵盖联合健康专业的特定问题,并且在交接班后更早地对患者进行复查。交接班不同组成部分的感知重要性差异显著:交班住院医师、交班护士、接班住院医师和接班护士分别强调总体管理计划、病例复杂性、未来48小时的管理计划和既往病史,包括过敏史。交接班的满意度与电子病历的交班预复查、交接班培训以及交接班后管理计划的清晰程度有关,在多变量分析中只有最后一个因素仍然显著。
接受过交接班预先培训的护士比住院医师更多。护理交接班更全面地涵盖联合健康专业。交接班各组成部分的感知重要性各不相同。管理计划更清晰与更高的满意度相关。
识别出交接班过程中的不足之处(缺乏交接班预先培训、未涵盖联合健康专业以及在交接班前未复查电子记录),从而为护士和住院医师之间的相互学习提供了机会。