Suppr超能文献

用于查看8位牙科图像的DICOM第14部分:GSDF校准的医用级显示器与DICOM第14部分:GSDF校准的“商用现货”(COTS)显示器

DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

作者信息

McIlgorm D J, McNulty J P

机构信息

1 Dublin Dental University Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(3):20140148. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140148. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether there is any difference in the presented image quality between a medical grade monitor and a "commercial off-the- shelf" (COTS) monitor when displaying an 8-bit dental image.

METHODS

The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) part 14: greyscale standard display function (GSDF) was verified for both monitors. A visual grading characteristics (VGC) curve was constructed to measure the difference in image quality between the two monitors by comparing radiological structures displayed on each monitor with a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated laptop monitor as reference.

RESULTS

All of the monitors conformed to within the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18 10% tolerance levels for the assessment of the DICOM part 14: GSDF. There was no difference in the preferred perceived visual sensation for the displayed image between the two tested monitors with the area under the VGC curve = 0.53 and 95% confidence interval = 0.47-0.59.

CONCLUSIONS

A DICOM part 14: GSDF COTS monitor is capable of displaying an image quality that is equally preferred to a DICOM part 14: GSDF medical grade monitor for an 8-bit image file.

摘要

目的

研究在显示8位牙科图像时,医用级显示器和“商用现货”(COTS)显示器所呈现的图像质量是否存在差异。

方法

对两台显示器的医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)第14部分:灰度标准显示功能(GSDF)进行验证。通过将每台显示器上显示的放射结构与经DICOM第14部分:GSDF校准的笔记本电脑显示器进行比较,构建视觉分级特性(VGC)曲线,以测量两台显示器之间的图像质量差异。

结果

所有显示器在评估DICOM第14部分:GSDF时均符合美国医学物理学家协会任务组18的10%公差水平。两台受试显示器上显示图像的首选感知视觉感受没有差异,VGC曲线下面积=0.53,95%置信区间=0.47-0.59。

结论

对于8位图像文件,DICOM第14部分:GSDF的COTS显示器能够显示出与DICOM第14部分:GSDF医用级显示器同样优质的图像。

相似文献

3
Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
Br Dent J. 2013 Dec;215(11):E22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1147.
4
Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor.
Radiat Med. 2006 Dec;24(10):653-8. doi: 10.1007/s11604-006-0085-3. Epub 2006 Dec 25.
6
SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:33-40. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5027-8. Epub 2002 Mar 21.
7
Implementing the DICOM Grayscale Standard Display Function for mixed hard- and soft-copy operations.
J Digit Imaging. 2002;15 Suppl 1:27-32. doi: 10.1007/s10278-002-5026-9. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
8
Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.
J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct;25(5):662-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9478-2.
10
Toward clinically relevant standardization of image quality.
J Digit Imaging. 2004 Dec;17(4):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-004-1031-5.

引用本文的文献

1
TSR guidelines for the practice of teleradiology: 2021 update.
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021 Jul;27(4):504-510. doi: 10.5152/dir.2021.20570.
2
Viewing your digital radiographs: which monitor is best?
Br Dent J. 2016 Apr 22;220(8):393-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.293.
3
Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150129. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150129. Epub 2015 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
Br Dent J. 2013 Dec;215(11):E22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1147.
3
8-bit or 11-bit monochrome displays--which image is preferred by the radiologist?
Eur Radiol. 2011 May;21(5):1088-96. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2014-1. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
4
Need for liquid-crystal display monitors having the capability of rendering higher than 8 bits in display-bit depth.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2009 Jan;2(1):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s12194-008-0051-0. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
5
Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Aug;108(2):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.053. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
6
Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
7
Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search.
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Aug;22(4):363-8. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9156-6. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
8
Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
J Digit Imaging. 2007 Jun;20(2):114-21. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5.
9
Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.
J Digit Imaging. 2008 Jun;21(2):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9022-y.
10
Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Mar;103(3):418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Aug 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验