• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在不同环境光条件下,带和不带 DICOM-GSDF 校准的监视器对龋病和根尖病变的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries and Periapical Lesions on a Monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF Calibration Under Different Ambient Light Conditions.

机构信息

Dentistry Department, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Governador Otávio Lage de Siqueira Hospital (HUGOL), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

出版信息

J Digit Imaging. 2022 Jun;35(3):654-659. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00596-w. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10278-022-00596-w
PMID:35166971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9156603/
Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of caries and periapical lesions on a monitor with and without DICOM part 14: grayscale standard display function (DICOM-GSDF) calibration under different ambient light conditions. Forty digital bitewing radiographs were selected, with or without radiographic images of carious lesions and forty digital periapical radiographs with or without periapical lesions were selected from archives of the Radiology Department at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Sergipe. The gold standard radiographic images were determined through consensus between two radiologists with more than 15 and 30 years of experience. The selected radiographs were evaluated on a LG LED monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF calibration under different ambient light conditions: Lx1 (low ambient lighting), Lx2 (moderate ambient lighting) and Lx3 (high ambient lighting). Kappa (K) values determined that evaluator 1 showed almost perfect agreement for all devices, while evaluator 2 presented a substantial agreement for all devices. Monitors with and without DICOM-GSDF calibration have similar accuracy values. The three ambient light conditions analyzed have similar accuracy and can be used for caries lesions diagnosis (p > 0.05); however, the best diagnostic accuracy of periapical lesions was found in Lx 2. The displays with and without DICOM-GSDF calibration studied in this research have similar accuracy and can be used to evaluate digital radiographs without changing the diagnostic capacity. The different ambient lighting conditions did not influence the evaluation of caries lesions. The best diagnostic accuracy of periapical lesions was found in moderate ambient lighting.

摘要

评估在不同环境光条件下使用和不使用 DICOM 第 14 部分:灰度标准显示功能 (DICOM-GSDF) 校准的监视器上龋病和根尖周病变的诊断准确性。从塞尔希培联邦大学医院放射科的档案中选择了 40 张数字化咬合片,有无龋病放射影像,以及 40 张数字化根尖周片,有无根尖周病变。金标准放射影像通过两位具有 15 年以上和 30 年以上经验的放射科医生的共识来确定。在不同的环境光条件下:Lx1(低环境照明)、Lx2(中等环境照明)和 Lx3(高环境照明),在具有和不具有 DICOM-GSDF 校准的 LG LED 监视器上评估所选的射线照片。Kappa(K)值确定评估者 1 对所有设备都显示出几乎完美的一致性,而评估者 2 对所有设备都显示出实质性的一致性。具有和不具有 DICOM-GSDF 校准的监视器具有相似的准确性值。分析的三种环境光条件具有相似的准确性,可用于龋病病变的诊断(p>0.05);然而,根尖周病变的最佳诊断准确性是在 Lx2 中发现的。在本研究中研究的具有和不具有 DICOM-GSDF 校准的显示器具有相似的准确性,可以在不改变诊断能力的情况下用于评估数字射线照片。不同的环境照明条件不会影响龋病病变的评估。根尖周病变的最佳诊断准确性是在中等环境照明中发现的。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries and Periapical Lesions on a Monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF Calibration Under Different Ambient Light Conditions.在不同环境光条件下,带和不带 DICOM-GSDF 校准的监视器对龋病和根尖病变的诊断准确性。
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Jun;35(3):654-659. doi: 10.1007/s10278-022-00596-w. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.胸部X光片中显示类型和室内照度的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4150-0. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.全景X线摄影中不同光照条件下DICOM校准和未校准的消费级及6兆像素显示器的比较。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(5):20140365. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140365. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.咬合翼片X线片中显示类型、DICOM校准和室内照度的影响。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150129. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150129. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
5
Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.显示器表面环境光水平对近距龋损数字放射评估的影响:一项体外研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Mar;41(3):192-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/15422221.
6
Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.监视器对数字化X线片邻面龋检测的影响——标准显示器与预校准的DICOM第14部分显示器的对比:一项体外研究
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
7
Could standardizing "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitors to the DICOM part 14: GSDF improve the presentation of dental images? A visual grading characteristics analysis.将“商业现货”(COTS)显示器标准化为 DICOM 第 14 部分:GSDF 是否可以改善牙科图像的呈现?视觉分级特征分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(9):20130121. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130121. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
8
Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.显示牙科X光片的“商用现货”(COTS)监视器的质量。
Br Dent J. 2013 Dec;215(11):E22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1147.
9
Carious lesions: diagnostic accuracy using pre-calibrated monitor in various ambient light levels: an in vitro study.龋损:不同环境光照水平下使用预校准显示器的诊断准确性:一项体外研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130071. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130071. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
10
DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.用于查看8位牙科图像的DICOM第14部分:GSDF校准的医用级显示器与DICOM第14部分:GSDF校准的“商用现货”(COTS)显示器
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(3):20140148. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140148. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography in Oral Pathology.口腔病理学中全景放射摄影诊断准确性的纵向分析。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2378-S2380. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_290_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The Detection of Dental Pathologies on Periapical Radiographs-Results from a Reliability Study.根尖片上牙体病变的检测——一项可靠性研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2224. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062224.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of smartphones and tablets in radiographic evaluation: accuracy of caries detection on bitewing radiographs.智能手机和平板电脑在放射学评估中的应用:在牙合翼片上检测龋齿的准确性。
Gen Dent. 2021 Jul-Aug;69(4):28-34.
2
The reliability of tablet computers in depicting maxillofacial radiographic landmarks.平板电脑在描绘颌面放射学标志方面的可靠性。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Sep;45(3):175-80. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.175. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Effect of display monitor devices on intra-oral radiographic caries diagnosis.显示器设备对口腔内X线龋病诊断的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Nov;19(8):1875-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1401-z. Epub 2015 Jan 18.
4
Comparison of periapical radiography with cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures in teeth with metallic post.根尖片与锥形束计算机断层扫描在诊断有金属桩牙齿垂直根折中的比较
J Conserv Dent. 2014 May;17(3):225-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.131781.
5
Carious lesions: diagnostic accuracy using pre-calibrated monitor in various ambient light levels: an in vitro study.龋损:不同环境光照水平下使用预校准显示器的诊断准确性:一项体外研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(8):20130071. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130071. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
6
Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.增强滤光片数字射线照相术在诊断近龋中的性能。
Braz Oral Res. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):245-51. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242013000300004.
7
Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.不同显示方式和室内照度对数字化牙科放射影像龋病诊断准确性的影响。
Caries Res. 2012;46(6):568-74. doi: 10.1159/000341218. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.医学成像系统显示性能评估:AAPM TG18报告执行摘要
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):1205-25. doi: 10.1118/1.1861159.