Suppr超能文献

脆性X综合征患者临床试验同意能力的家长评定

Parent ratings of ability to consent for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.

作者信息

Bailey Donald B, Raspa Melissa, Wheeler Anne, Edwards Anne, Bishop Ellen, Bann Carla, Borasky David, Appelbaum Paul S

机构信息

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):18-28. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540591.

Abstract

Advances in understanding neurobiology and intellectual disabilities have led to clinical trials testing new medications. This study assessed parents' perceptions of the ability of their son or daughter with fragile X syndrome (FXS), an inherited form of intellectual disability, to participate in the consent process for clinical trials. Four hundred twenty-two families participated in a survey that included six items assessing various aspects of the ability to provide consent. A rank ordering of decisional tasks was found. The easiest task was to understand that the medication was different from his or her medical treatment; the most difficult was the ability to understand and weigh the potential benefits and risks of study participation. Factor analysis suggested that despite the range in difficulty, the six items were best summarized by a single decisional ability score. Parents of 29% of males reported that their son was not at all capable of participating, but the remainder exhibited a range of decisional skills. Factors associated with this variability include age and parents' willingness to enroll their child in clinical trials. We conclude that many individuals with FXS appear to be able to participate at some level in the consent or assent process, but will likely need individualized support to maximize effective participation.

摘要

在神经生物学和智力障碍研究方面取得的进展促使了对新药物的临床试验。本研究评估了患有脆性X综合征(FXS,一种遗传性智力障碍)的子女的父母对于其参与临床试验同意过程能力的看法。422个家庭参与了一项调查,该调查包含六个评估提供同意能力不同方面的项目。发现了决策任务的排序。最容易的任务是理解药物与他或她的医疗治疗不同;最难的是理解并权衡参与研究的潜在益处和风险的能力。因子分析表明,尽管难度各异,但这六个项目最好由一个单一的决策能力得分来概括。29%的男性患儿家长表示他们的儿子完全没有能力参与,但其余家长则表现出一系列决策技能。与这种变异性相关的因素包括年龄以及家长让孩子参加临床试验的意愿。我们得出结论,许多患有脆性X综合征的个体似乎能够在某种程度上参与同意或赞成过程,但可能需要个性化支持以实现有效参与的最大化。

相似文献

1
Parent ratings of ability to consent for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):18-28. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540591.
2
Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Males and Females with Fragile X Syndrome.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 May;50(5):1725-1747. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03930-4.
5
Fragile X syndrome clinical trials: exploring parental decision-making.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Aug;63(8):926-935. doi: 10.1111/jir.12605. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
Parental Perspectives on Pharmacological Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Study in Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1333-1340. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0111-x. Epub 2017 May 24.
8
Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2305-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.7.2305.
9
A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):189-197. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1251507. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
Assessing decisional capacity for research participation in psychiatric patients and their relatives.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr-Jun;3(2):125-133. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.075. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and best practices for recruiting families of children with intellectual disabilities for health research.
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 May 16;29(3):17446295241255178. doi: 10.1177/17446295241255178.
4
Implications of the Revised Common Rule for Human Participant Research.
Chest. 2019 Feb;155(2):272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Parental Perspectives on Pharmacological Clinical Trials: a Qualitative Study in Down Syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome.
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1333-1340. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0111-x. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):424-438. doi: 10.1177/1556264616651182. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
8
A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):1-7. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552627. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

3
Neurobehavioural evidence for the involvement of the FMR1 gene in female carriers of fragile X syndrome.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):522-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
4
Fragile X syndrome therapeutics: translation, meet translational medicine.
Neuron. 2013 Jan 23;77(2):212-3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.009.
6
Fragile X syndrome: from targets to treatments.
Neuropharmacology. 2013 May;68:83-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
7
An epigenetic framework for neurodevelopmental disorders: from pathogenesis to potential therapy.
Neuropharmacology. 2013 May;68:2-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
8
The human rights context for ethical requirements for involving people with intellectual disability in medical research.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Nov;56(11):1122-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01617.x.
10
Shared synaptic pathophysiology in syndromic and nonsyndromic rodent models of autism.
Science. 2012 Oct 5;338(6103):128-32. doi: 10.1126/science.1224159. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验