Annett Robert D, Brody Janet L, Scherer David G, Turner Charles W, Dalen Jeanne, Raissy Hengameh
a Department of Pediatrics , University of Mississippi Medical Center.
b Center for Family and Adolescent Research , Oregon Research Institute.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):189-197. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2016.1251507. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Voluntary consent/assent with adolescents invited to participate in research raises challenging problems. No studies to date have attempted to manipulate autonomy in relation to assent/consent processes. This study evaluated the effects of an autonomy-enhanced individualized assent/consent procedure embedded within a randomized pediatric asthma clinical trial.
Families were randomly assigned to remain together or separated during a consent/assent process; the latter we characterize as an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure. We hypothesized that separating adolescents from their parents would improve adolescent assent by increasing knowledge and appreciation of the clinical trial and willingness to participate.
Sixty-four adolescent-parent dyads completed procedures. The together versus separate randomization made no difference in adolescent or parent willingness to participate. However, significant differences were found in both parent and adolescent knowledge of the asthma clinical trial based on the assent/consent procedure and adolescent age. The separate assent/consent procedure improved knowledge of study risks and benefits for older adolescents and their parents but not for the younger youth or their parents. Regardless of the assent/consent process, younger adolescents had lower comprehension of information associated with the study medication and research risks and benefits, but not study procedures or their research rights and privileges.
The use of an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure for adolescents may improve their and their parent's informed assent/consent without impacting research participation decisions. Traditional assent/consent procedures may result in a "diffusion of responsibility" effect between parents and older adolescents, specifically in attending to key information associated with study risks and benefits.
邀请青少年参与研究时的自愿同意/赞成引发了具有挑战性的问题。迄今为止,尚无研究试图在同意/赞成过程中操控自主性。本研究评估了一项嵌入随机儿科哮喘临床试验中的增强自主性的个性化同意/赞成程序的效果。
在同意/赞成过程中,家庭被随机分配为保持在一起或分开;后者我们将其描述为增强自主性的同意/赞成程序。我们假设将青少年与父母分开会通过增加对临床试验的了解和认识以及参与意愿来提高青少年的同意率。
64对青少年-父母二元组完成了程序。在一起与分开的随机分组在青少年或父母的参与意愿上没有差异。然而,基于同意/赞成程序和青少年年龄,在父母和青少年对哮喘临床试验的了解方面发现了显著差异。分开的同意/赞成程序提高了年龄较大的青少年及其父母对研究风险和益处的了解,但对年龄较小的青少年及其父母没有效果。无论同意/赞成过程如何,年龄较小的青少年对与研究药物以及研究风险和益处相关信息的理解较低,但对研究程序或他们的研究权利和特权的理解并非如此。
对青少年使用增强自主性的同意/赞成程序可能会提高他们及其父母的知情同意率,而不会影响研究参与决策。传统的同意/赞成程序可能会导致父母与年龄较大的青少年之间出现“责任分散”效应,特别是在关注与研究风险和益处相关的关键信息方面。