Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Aug;40(4):253-278. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09502-y.
Bioethics has made a compelling case for the role of experience and empirical research in ethics. This may explain why the movement for empirical ethics has such a firm grounding in bioethics. However, the theoretical framework according to which empirical research contributes to ethics-and the specific role(s) it can or should play-remains manifold and unclear. In this paper, we build from pragmatic theory stressing the importance of experience and outcomes in establishing the meaning of ethics concepts. We then propose three methodological steps according to which the meaning of ethics concepts can be refined based on experience and empirical research: (1) function identification, (2) function enrichment, and (3) function testing. These steps are explained and situated within the broader commitment of pragmatic ethics to a perspective of moral growth and human flourishing (eudaimonia). We hope that this proposal will give specific direction to the bridging of theoretical and empirical research in ethics and thus support stronger actualization of ethics concepts.
生命伦理学有力地论证了经验和实证研究在伦理学中的作用。这或许可以解释为什么实证伦理学运动在生命伦理学中有如此坚实的基础。然而,根据经验研究有助于伦理学的理论框架——以及它可以或应该发挥的具体作用——仍然多种多样且不明确。在本文中,我们从强调经验和结果在确定伦理学概念意义方面的重要性的实用主义理论出发。然后,我们根据经验和实证研究来细化伦理学概念意义的三个方法步骤提出建议:(1)功能识别,(2)功能丰富,和(3)功能检验。这些步骤在更广泛的实用主义伦理学对道德成长和人类繁荣(幸福)的观点的背景下进行了解释和定位。我们希望这一建议能为连接伦理学中的理论和实证研究提供具体指导,从而支持更强有力地实现伦理学概念。