Ólafsdóttir Jóna Marín, Brolin Karin, Blouin Jean-Sébastien, Siegmund Gunter P
*Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden †School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; and ‡MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 15;40(4):E211-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000721.
Human volunteers were exposed experimentally to multidirectional seated perturbations.
To determine the activation patterns, spatial distribution and preferred directions of reflexively activated cervical muscles for human model development and validation.
Models of the human head and neck are used to predict occupant kinematics and injuries in motor vehicle collisions. Because of a dearth of relevant experimental data, few models use activation schemes based on in vivo recordings of muscle activation and instead assume uniform activation levels for all muscles within presumed agonist or antagonist groups. Data recorded from individual cervical muscles are needed to validate or refute this assumption.
Eight subjects (6 males, 2 females) were exposed to seated perturbations in 8 directions. Electromyography was measured with wire electrodes inserted into the sternocleidomastoid, trapezius, levator scapulae, splenius capitis, semispinalis capitis, semispinalis cervicis, and multifidus muscles. Surface electrodes were used to measure sternohyoid activity. Muscle activity evoked by the perturbations was normalized with recordings from maximum voluntary contractions.
The multidirectional perturbations produced activation patterns that varied with direction within and between muscles. Sternocleidomastoid and sternohyoid activated similarly in forward and forward oblique directions. The semispinalis capitis, semispinalis cervicis, and multifidus exhibited similar spatial patterns and preferred directions, but varied in activation levels. Levator scapulae and trapezius activity generally remained low, and splenius capitis activity varied widely between subjects.
All muscles showed muscle- and direction-specific contraction levels. Models should implement muscle- and direction-specific activation schemes during simulations of the head and neck responses to omnidirectional horizontal perturbations where muscle forces influence kinematics, such as during emergency maneuvers and low-severity crashes.
N/A.
让人类志愿者接受多方向的坐姿扰动实验。
确定反射性激活的颈部肌肉的激活模式、空间分布和优先方向,以用于人体模型的开发和验证。
人体头部和颈部模型用于预测机动车碰撞中驾乘人员的运动学和损伤情况。由于缺乏相关实验数据,很少有模型采用基于肌肉激活的体内记录的激活方案,而是假定在假定的主动肌或拮抗肌群内所有肌肉的激活水平是均匀的。需要从个体颈部肌肉记录的数据来验证或反驳这一假设。
8名受试者(6名男性,2名女性)在8个方向上接受坐姿扰动。使用插入胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌、肩胛提肌、头夹肌、头半棘肌、颈半棘肌和多裂肌的线状电极测量肌电图。使用表面电极测量胸骨舌骨肌的活动。由扰动引起的肌肉活动通过最大自主收缩的记录进行归一化。
多方向扰动产生的激活模式随肌肉内部和之间的方向而变化。胸锁乳突肌和胸骨舌骨肌在向前和向前倾斜方向上的激活情况相似。头半棘肌、颈半棘肌和多裂肌表现出相似的空间模式和优先方向,但激活水平有所不同。肩胛提肌和斜方肌的活动通常保持较低水平,头夹肌的活动在受试者之间差异很大。
所有肌肉都表现出肌肉和方向特异性的收缩水平。在模拟头部和颈部对全方位水平扰动的反应(如紧急操作和低严重程度碰撞期间,肌肉力量影响运动学)时,模型应采用肌肉和方向特异性的激活方案。
无。