Dowse Eileen Mary, van der Riet Pamela, Keatinge Diana Rosemary
School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Nurse Res. 2014 Nov;22(2):34-9. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.2.34.e1302.
To highlight from a doctoral student's perspective some of the unexpected and challenging issues that may arise when collecting data in a complex, qualitative study.
Using a qualitative approach to undertaking a PhD requires commitment to the research topic, the acquisition of a variety of research skills and the development of expertise in writing. Despite close research supervision and guidance, the first author of this paper experienced unexpected hurdles when collecting data. This article highlights these hurdles and compares them with similar and dissimilar challenges raised by a social researcher with 30 years' experience (White 2012).
The first author's experience of field research during her PhD candidature.
Informed by a critical theoretical perspective, a snowballing technique was used to examine issues related to data collection by a doctoral student in a qualitative research study.
The first author found the logistics of qualitative data collection, concerns about transparency, role confusion and power differentials with participants, and the effective use of video recording technology, unexpectedly challenging. Many of these issues are highlighted in the literature and/or during research supervision. However, the student researcher remains a novice when entering the field. It is often only on reflection after encountering the hurdle that the student recognises future pre-emptive or alternative methods of data collection.
The challenges faced as a doctoral student managing the data collection phase of the study concurred with White's discussion of some of the 'real life challenges that novice researchers might face' (2012). Specific guidance and prudence are needed by research students to know when enough data have been collected for manageable analysis within the limits of candidature. Use of reflexivity and mindfulness practised by the student during this phase assisted the ability to reflect, respond and learn from issues as they arose and aim for a harmonious work, study and life balance.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE/RESEARCH: This paper highlights these issues and offers suggestions for other research higher degree students facing similar challenges when collecting data in a complex qualitative study.
从博士生的角度强调在复杂的定性研究中收集数据时可能出现的一些意外且具有挑战性的问题。
采用定性方法攻读博士学位需要对研究课题的投入、多种研究技能的掌握以及写作专业知识的培养。尽管有密切的研究监督和指导,但本文的第一作者在收集数据时仍遇到了意外的障碍。本文突出了这些障碍,并将其与一位有30年经验的社会研究者(怀特,2012年)提出的类似及不同挑战进行了比较。
第一作者在攻读博士学位期间的实地研究经历。
以批判性理论视角为依据,采用滚雪球技术来审视博士生在定性研究中与数据收集相关的问题。
第一作者发现定性数据收集的后勤工作、对透明度的担忧、与参与者的角色混淆和权力差异以及视频录制技术的有效使用,都意外地具有挑战性。这些问题中有许多在文献中和/或研究监督过程中都有突出体现。然而,学生研究者进入该领域时仍是新手。通常只有在遇到障碍后反思,学生才会认识到未来数据收集的先发制人或替代方法。
作为博士生在管理研究的数据收集阶段所面临的挑战与怀特对“新手研究者可能面临的一些现实生活挑战”(2012年)的讨论一致。研究学生需要具体的指导和谨慎态度,以了解在博士候选资格的限制范围内何时已收集到足够的数据用于可管理的分析。学生在此阶段运用反思性和正念有助于在问题出现时进行反思、做出回应并从中学习的能力,从而实现工作、学习和生活的和谐平衡。
对实践/研究的启示:本文突出了这些问题,并为其他在复杂定性研究中收集数据时面临类似挑战的高等研究学位学生提供了建议。