一项关于使用脱水人羊膜/绒毛膜同种异体移植、生物工程皮肤替代物或慢性下肢糖尿病溃疡治疗的护理标准进行愈合的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心比较有效性研究。

A prospective, randomised, controlled, multi-centre comparative effectiveness study of healing using dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft, bioengineered skin substitute or standard of care for treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers.

作者信息

Zelen Charles M, Gould Lisa, Serena Thomas E, Carter Marissa J, Keller Jennifer, Li William W

机构信息

Professional Education and Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.

Wound Recovery Center, Kent Hospital, Warwick, RI, USA.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2015 Dec;12(6):724-32. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12395. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

Abstract

A prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, multi-centre clinical trial was conducted at three sites to compare the healing effectiveness of treatment of chronic lower extremity diabetic ulcers with either weekly applications of Apligraf(®) (Organogenesis, Inc., Canton, MA), EpiFix(®) (MiMedx Group, Inc., Marietta, GA), or standard wound care with collagen-alginate dressing. The primary study outcome was the percent change in complete wound healing after 4 and 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcomes included percent change in wound area per week, velocity of wound closure and a calculation of the amount and cost of Apligraf or EpiFix used. A total of 65 subjects entered the 2-week run-in period and 60 were randomised (20 per group). The proportion of patients in the EpiFix group achieving complete wound closure within 4 and 6 weeks was 85% and 95%, significantly higher (all adjusted P-values ≤ 0·003) than for patients receiving Apligraf (35% and 45%), or standard care (30% and 35%). After 1 week, wounds treated with EpiFix had reduced in area by 83·5% compared with 53·1% for wounds treated with Apligraf. Median time to healing was significantly faster (all adjusted P-values ≤0·001) with EpiFix (13 days) compared to Apligraf (49 days) or standard care (49 days). The mean number of grafts used and the graft cost per patient were lower in the EpiFix group campared to the Apligraf group, at 2·15 grafts at a cost of $1669 versus 6·2 grafts at a cost of $9216, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate the clinical and resource utilisation superiority of EpiFix compared to Apligraf or standard of care, for the treatment of diabetic ulcers of the lower extremities.

摘要

在三个地点进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照、平行组、多中心临床试验,以比较每周应用Apligraf(®)(Organogenesis公司,马萨诸塞州坎顿)、EpiFix(®)(MiMedx集团公司,佐治亚州玛丽埃塔)或使用胶原-藻酸盐敷料的标准伤口护理治疗慢性下肢糖尿病溃疡的愈合效果。主要研究结果是治疗4周和6周后完全伤口愈合的百分比变化。次要结果包括每周伤口面积的百分比变化、伤口闭合速度以及使用的Apligraf或EpiFix的数量和成本计算。共有65名受试者进入为期2周的导入期,60名被随机分组(每组20名)。EpiFix组在4周和6周内实现完全伤口闭合的患者比例分别为85%和95%,显著高于接受Apligraf治疗的患者(35%和45%)或标准护理的患者(30%和35%)(所有校正P值≤0.003)。1周后,用EpiFix治疗的伤口面积减少了83.5%,而用Apligraf治疗的伤口面积减少了53.1%。与Apligraf(49天)或标准护理(49天)相比,EpiFix(13天)的中位愈合时间显著更快(所有校正P值≤0.001)。与Apligraf组相比,EpiFix组每位患者使用的移植物平均数量和移植物成本更低,分别为2.15个移植物,成本为1669美元,而Apligraf组为6.2个移植物,成本为9216美元。这项研究的结果表明,与Apligraf或护理标准相比,EpiFix在治疗下肢糖尿病溃疡方面具有临床和资源利用优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa92/7950807/7b81256bb593/IWJ-12-724-g001.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索