• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道混合式NOTES胆囊切除术的安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sodergren Mikael H, Markar Sheraz, Pucher Philip H, Badran Ismail A, Jiao Long R, Darzi Ara

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London 10th Floor QEQM Building, St. Mary's Hospital South Wharf Road, London, W2 1NY, UK,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2077-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3915-x. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3915-x
PMID:25424364
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing data regarding clinical outcomes following transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy (TVC), a consensus regarding safety based on comparative studies has yet to be reached. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare safety and clinical outcomes of TVC with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) for the treatment of benign gallstone disease.

METHODS

A comprehensive search for published studies comparing TVC and CLC was performed. Review of each study was conducted and data were extracted. All pooled outcome measures were determined using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Data were retrieved from 14 studies describing 1,145 patients. There was no difference in total complications (POR = 0.68; 95 % CI 0.40-1.14; P = 0.14), incidence of bile duct injury (POR = 1.33; 95 % CI 0.31-5.66; P = 0.70), Clavien-Dindo Grade II (POR = 0.48; 95 % CI 0.14-1.60; P = 0.23) or Grade III (POR = 0.63; 95 % CI 0.24-1.65; P = 0.34) complications between TCV and CLC. Time of return to normal activities was significantly reduced in the TVC group (WMD = -4.86 days; 95 % CI -9.33 to -0.39; P = 0.03), and there was a non-significant reduction in postoperative pain on days 1 (WMD = -0.80; 95 % CI -1.60 to 0.01; P = 0.05) and 3 (WMD = -0.89; 95 % CI -1.77 to -0.01; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TVC is safe when performed by appropriately trained surgeons and may be associated with a faster return to normal activities and decreased postoperative pain.

摘要

背景

尽管经阴道混合NOTES胆囊切除术(TVC)后临床结局的数据越来越多,但基于比较研究的安全性共识尚未达成。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较TVC与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)治疗良性胆结石疾病的安全性和临床结局。

方法

对比较TVC和CLC的已发表研究进行全面检索。对每项研究进行审查并提取数据。所有汇总结局指标均使用随机效应模型确定。

结果

从14项描述1145例患者的研究中检索到数据。TCV和CLC之间在总并发症(比值比[POR]=0.68;95%可信区间[CI]0.40-1.14;P=0.14)、胆管损伤发生率(POR=1.33;95%CI 0.31-5.66;P=0.70)、Clavien-Dindo二级(POR=0.48;95%CI 0.14-1.60;P=0.23)或三级(POR=0.63;95%CI 0.24-1.65;P=0.34)并发症方面无差异。TVC组恢复正常活动的时间显著缩短(加权均数差[WMD]=-4.86天;95%CI -9.33至-0.39;P=0.03),术后第1天(WMD=-0.80;95%CI -1.60至0.01;P=0.05)和第3天(WMD=-0.89;95%CI -1.77至-0.01;P=0.05)的术后疼痛有非显著性减轻。

结论

由经过适当培训的外科医生进行TVC是安全的,并且可能与更快恢复正常活动和减轻术后疼痛相关。

相似文献

1
Safety of transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道混合式NOTES胆囊切除术的安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2077-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3915-x. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
2
Safety Outcomes of NOTES Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.NOTES胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Oct;26(5):347-353. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000284.
3
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3.
6
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 12;2013(12):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub4.
7
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.胆管结石的手术治疗与内镜治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术时腹腔内局部麻醉与不腹腔内局部麻醉的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD007337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007337.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.腹腔镜与内镜手术治疗胆结石的研究进展:一项叙述性综述
BMC Surg. 2025 May 29;25(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02977-8.
2
Evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a narrative review.微创胆囊切除术的发展:叙述性综述。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02659-x.
3
Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.腹腔镜辅助经阴道胆囊切除术-美国军方的长期随访经验。

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative pain after transvaginal cholecystectomy: single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.经阴道胆囊切除术后的疼痛:单中心、双盲、随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1886-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3409-2. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
2
Comparison of immediate postoperative pain after transvaginal versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术术后即刻疼痛的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1141-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3294-8.
3
Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.
JSLS. 2024 Jan-Mar;28(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00059.
4
An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.一项比较经阴道混合手术记录与四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的观察性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jan 10;15(1):e33589. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33589. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
[Clinical value of alternative technologies to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy - single port, reduced port, robotics, NOTES].[标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术替代技术的临床价值——单孔、减少孔道、机器人手术、经自然腔道内镜手术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jun;93(6):566-576. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01608-9. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Does obesity influence the results in Transvaginal Hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy?肥胖是否会影响经阴道杂交NOTES 胆囊切除术的结果?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4632-4638. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6216-y. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: Current status and future prospects.超声内镜引导下胆囊引流:现状与未来展望。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_3_18.
8
Feasibility and Technique for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Liver Resection: A Porcine Model.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术肝切除术的可行性及技术:猪模型研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Feb;27(1):e6-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000367.
9
[Implementation of hybrid-NOTES sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease : In a center for minimally invasive surgery].[混合NOTES乙状结肠切除术在憩室病中的应用:在一家微创手术中心]
Chirurg. 2017 Jun;88(6):518-524. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0333-8.
10
Hybrid Transvaginal NOTES and Mini-Laparoscopic Colectomy: Benefit Through Synergy.经阴道NOTES与微型腹腔镜联合结肠切除术:协同增效带来益处
JSLS. 2016 Oct-Dec;20(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00062.
经阴道/经脐混合式——NOTES——与三套管针腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比:一项随机临床试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):451-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218.
4
Pure NOTES transvaginal appendectomy with gasless laparoscopy.经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)经阴道无气腹腹腔镜下阑尾切除术。
J Surg Res. 2014 Jan;186(1):179-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
5
Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.单孔与NOTES 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比有临床或美容优势吗?一项比较单孔经阴道与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病例对照研究。
World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2221-4.
6
Pure transvaginal ventral hernia repair in humans.人类单纯经阴道腹疝修补术。
Surg Innov. 2014 Apr;21(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/1553350613497269. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
7
The EURO-NOTES clinical registry for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a 2-year activity report.EURO-NOTES 经自然腔道内镜手术临床注册中心:2 年活动报告。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Sep;27(9):3073-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2908-5. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
8
Long-term results of transvaginal/transumbilical versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy--an analysis of 88 patients.经阴道/经脐与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的长期结果——88 例患者的分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Apr;398(4):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1071-8. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.阴道切开术作为一种手术入路的安全性:对经自然腔道内镜手术的启示
JSLS. 2012 Jul-Sep;16(3):413-20. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882735854.
10
NOTES transvaginal hybrid cholecystectomy: the United States human experience.NOTES 经阴道杂交胆囊切除术:美国人类经验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):514-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2470-6. Epub 2012 Jul 18.