Kritzer Sara, Magner Kristin, Warshak Carri R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio USA (S.K., K.M., C.R.W.); and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio USA (S.K., K.M.).
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Dec;33(12):2173-9. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.12.2173.
To evaluate whether an increasing body mass index (BMI) influences the accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries over a 2-year period in a single institution. Patients were included if they had a fetal weight estimation within 2 weeks of delivery. The Δ estimated fetal weight (EFW) was calculated by subtracting the sonographic EFW from the birth weight and compared among our study groups, which were based on the maternal BMI class. We also compared the absolute percentage error of estimation, rate of substantial error greater than 20%, rate of underestimation, and ability to predict fetal weight greater than 4000 g. Post hoc power analysis determined that our study group of 1200 patients allowed for an α of .05 and β of .90.
We included 1177 women in our analysis. The median ΔEFW varied between study groups: 137, 202, 157, 200, and 189 g, respectively, in normal-weight, overweight, and obese classes 1, 2, and 3 (P = .01). The median percentage error of estimation between study groups varied between 5.0% in normal-weight women and 7.1% in class 2 obese women (P= .05). The rate of substantial error was similar between study groups and varied between 2.7% in class 1 obese women and 4.3% in normal-weight and class 2 obese women. Linear regression analysis showed a weak association between maternal BMI and ΔEFW (R(2) = 0.005; r = 0.069).
The absolute ΔEFW was lower in normal-weight women; however, the percentage error of the EFW was similar between women of varying BMI classifications, as was the rate of substantial error and the rate of underestimation of the EFW.
评估体重指数(BMI)的增加是否会影响超声估计胎儿体重的准确性。
我们在一家机构对2年内的单胎分娩进行了一项回顾性队列研究。如果患者在分娩前2周内进行了胎儿体重估计,则纳入研究。通过用出生体重减去超声估计的胎儿体重(EFW)来计算估计胎儿体重的差值(ΔEFW),并在基于母亲BMI分类的研究组之间进行比较。我们还比较了估计的绝对百分比误差、大于20%的显著误差率、低估率以及预测胎儿体重超过4000 g的能力。事后功效分析确定,我们1200名患者的研究组允许α为0.05,β为0.90。
我们的分析纳入了1177名女性。不同研究组之间的ΔEFW中位数有所不同:正常体重、超重以及肥胖1、2和3级的ΔEFW中位数分别为137、202、157、200和189 g(P = 0.01)。不同研究组之间估计的中位数百分比误差在正常体重女性中为5.0%,在2级肥胖女性中为7.1%(P = 0.05)。不同研究组之间的显著误差率相似,在1级肥胖女性中为2.7%,在正常体重和2级肥胖女性中为4.3%。线性回归分析显示母亲BMI与ΔEFW之间存在弱关联(R(2) = 0.005;r = 0.069)。
正常体重女性的绝对ΔEFW较低;然而,不同BMI分类女性的EFW百分比误差相似,显著误差率和EFW低估率也相似。