The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol.
作者信息
Valente M, Van Vliet D
机构信息
Washington University School of Medicine, Dept. of Otolaryngology/HNS, Div. of Adult Audiology, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Private Practice, Yorba Linda, CA 92886.
出版信息
Trends Amplif. 1997 Mar;2(1):6-35. doi: 10.1177/108471389700200102.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol.
Trends Amplif. 1997 Mar;2(1):6-35. doi: 10.1177/108471389700200102.
2
Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Ear Hear. 2001 Dec;22(6):501-15. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200112000-00006.
3
IHAFF loudness contour test: reliability and effects of approach mode in normal-hearing subjects.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1997 Aug;8(4):243-56.
4
Short-term and long-term hearing aid benefit and user satisfaction: a comparison between two fitting protocols.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Jun;18(6):482-95. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.6.3.
5
Hearing aid fine-tuning based on Dutch descriptions.
Int J Audiol. 2017 Jul;56(7):507-515. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1288302. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
6
Exploring the Effects of the Narrative Embodied in the Hearing Aid Fitting Process on Treatment Outcomes.
Ear Hear. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):517-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000157.
7
Prescribing and Verifying Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols and Outcomes from the Ontario Infant Hearing Program.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):188-203. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15051.
8
Societal effects of hearing aid fitting among the moderately hearing impaired.
Int J Audiol. 2003 Apr;42(3):152-60. doi: 10.3109/14992020309090424.
9
[APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].
HNO. 2017 Nov;65(11):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0350-z.
10
Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010).
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Jun;43(3):217-28. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
引用本文的文献
1
Development and Evaluation of a Loudness Validation Method With Natural Signals for Hearing Aid Fitting.
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241299778. doi: 10.1177/23312165241299778.
2
Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit.
Codas. 2021 Oct 18;34(1):e20200310. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020310. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparison of Relative Loudness Judgment in Children using Listening Devices with Typically Developing Children.
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;25(1):e54-e63. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702971. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
Considerations in the Development of a Sound Tolerance Interview and Questionnaire Instrument.
Semin Hear. 2017 Feb;38(1):53-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598065.
5
Repeated Measurement of Absolute and Relative Judgments of Loudness: Clinical Relevance for Prescriptive Fitting of Aided Target Gains for soft, Comfortable, and Loud, But Ok Sound Levels.
Semin Hear. 2017 Feb;38(1):26-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598064.
6
Auditory and Non-Auditory Contributions for Unaided Speech Recognition in Noise as a Function of Hearing Aid Use.
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00219. eCollection 2017.
7
Change in Speech Perception and Auditory Evoked Potentials over Time after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deaf Adults.
Semin Hear. 2016 Feb;37(1):62-73. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570329.
8
Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.
Trends Amplif. 2002 Dec;6(4):131-65. doi: 10.1177/108471380200600402.
9
Using the Frye SPL Fitting Software to Fit Hearing Aids Incorporating Nonlinear Signal Processing.
Trends Amplif. 1998 Dec;3(4):162-71. doi: 10.1177/108471389800300405.
10
The madsen aurical.
Trends Amplif. 1998 Dec;3(4):152-61. doi: 10.1177/108471389800300404.
本文引用的文献
1
2
Hearing aid selection for the 1990s: where to?
J Am Acad Audiol. 1996 Dec;7(6):377-95.
3
Intersubject variability of real-ear sound pressure level: conventional and insert earphones.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Nov;5(6):390-8.
4
The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
Ear Hear. 1995 Apr;16(2):176-86. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
5
Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90.
Ear Hear. 1987 Jun;8(3):162-9. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198706000-00006.
6
Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Dec;21(4):668-81. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2104.668.
Zotero 插件