• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在台湾的一个大型数据库中测量残疾及其预测因素。

Measuring disability and its predicting factors in a large database in Taiwan using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

作者信息

Chi Wen-Chou, Chang Kwang-Hwa, Escorpizo Reuben, Yen Chia-Feng, Liao Hua-Fang, Chang Feng-Hang, Chiou Hung-Yi, Teng Sue-Wen, Chiu Wen-Ta, Liou Tsan-Hon

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 235, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 25;11(12):12148-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212148.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph111212148
PMID:25429682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4276606/
Abstract

The definition of disability had been unclear until the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health was promulgated in 2001 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Disability is a critical but relatively neglected public-health concern. We conducted this study to measure disabilities by using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) and identify the factors that contribute to disabilities. We obtained and analyzed the data on people who applied to Taiwan's disability registration system between September 2012 and August 2013. A total of 158,174 cases were selected for this study. Among the people included in this study, 53% were male, and the females were on average 3 years older than the males. More males than females were of a low socioeconomic status, but the rate of employment was higher among the males than among the females. Age, sex, place of residence, and types and severity of impairment were all determined to be factors that independently contributed to disability. This study has demonstrated that disability can be measured and compared using WHODAS 2.0. Increasing the public-health attention devoted to disability and identifying the factors associated with disability can promote independence and social participation in people with disabilities.

摘要

在世界卫生组织(WHO)于2001年颁布《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》之前,残疾的定义一直不明确。残疾是一个关键但相对被忽视的公共卫生问题。我们开展这项研究,旨在使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)来衡量残疾情况,并确定导致残疾的因素。我们获取并分析了2012年9月至2013年8月期间申请台湾残疾登记系统的人员数据。本研究共选取了158,174个案例。在纳入本研究的人群中,53%为男性,女性平均比男性大3岁。社会经济地位较低的男性多于女性,但男性的就业率高于女性。年龄、性别、居住地点以及损伤类型和严重程度均被确定为独立导致残疾的因素。本研究表明,可使用WHODAS 2.0对残疾进行衡量和比较。加强对残疾问题的公共卫生关注并确定与残疾相关的因素,可促进残疾人的独立性和社会参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd1/4276606/81dddbf92de3/ijerph-11-12148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd1/4276606/530f9c8e5b3d/ijerph-11-12148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd1/4276606/81dddbf92de3/ijerph-11-12148-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd1/4276606/530f9c8e5b3d/ijerph-11-12148-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cd1/4276606/81dddbf92de3/ijerph-11-12148-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring disability and its predicting factors in a large database in Taiwan using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在台湾的一个大型数据库中测量残疾及其预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 25;11(12):12148-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212148.
2
Validity and reliability of the Functioning Disability Evaluation Scale-Adult Version based on the WHODAS 2.0--36 items.基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的成人版功能残疾评定量表(36项)的效度和信度
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Nov;113(11):839-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
3
What is the gap in activity and participation between people with disability and the general population in Taiwan?台湾地区残疾人和一般人群在活动和参与方面存在差距吗?
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Aug 1;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0628-5.
4
WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.WHODAS 2.0 可预测颅脑损伤患者的住院情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091484.
5
World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版:对意大利语版验证的贡献
Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):553-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802240498.
6
Assessment of functioning and disability in patients with schizophrenia using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in a large-scale database.使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 大规模数据库评估精神分裂症患者的功能和残疾。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Feb;268(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s00406-017-0834-6. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
7
Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0对创伤性脑损伤和脊髓损伤患者进行功能与残疾分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):4116-27. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404116.
8
Effects of Hearing Disability on the Employment Status Using WHODAS 2.0 in Taiwan.使用 WHODAS 2.0 评估听力障碍对台湾地区就业状况的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9374. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249374.
9
Determinants of Employment Outcome for the People with Schizophrenia Using the WHODAS 2.0.使用 WHODAS 2.0 评估精神分裂症患者的就业结果决定因素。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9794-6.
10
Functioning and disability analysis by using WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in older adults Taiwanese patients with dementia.采用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0对台湾老年痴呆患者进行功能与残疾分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Aug;38(17):1652-63. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107636. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment and validation of early prediction model for post-stroke dysphagia.脑卒中后吞咽困难早期预测模型的建立与验证
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 May 11;37(1):145. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-03060-1.
2
Functioning performance trajectory and its associated factors for people with disability-A 4-year national study.残疾人士的功能表现轨迹及其相关因素——一项为期四年的全国性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21510-3.
3
Association between dysphagia and activities of daily living in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Functioning Disability Evaluation Scale-Adult Version based on the WHODAS 2.0--36 items.基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的成人版功能残疾评定量表(36项)的效度和信度
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Nov;113(11):839-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
2
Does the planned long-term care policy in Taiwan meet the needs of people with disabilities?台湾规划中的长期照护政策是否符合残疾人的需求?
Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
3
Analysis of disability using WHODAS 2.0 among the middle-aged and elderly in Cinco Villas, Spain.
老年人吞咽困难与日常生活活动之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Dec;15(6):1555-1571. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00999-8. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
4
The bidirectional relationship between sarcopenia and disability in China: a longitudinal study from CHARLS.中国肌少症与残疾之间的双向关系:来自 CHARLS 的纵向研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 7;12:1309673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309673. eCollection 2024.
5
The Sociodemographic Factors Related to Disability of Applicants of Welfare Benefits in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey Based on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0.希腊福利金申请人残疾相关的社会人口学因素:基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHODAS)2.0的横断面调查
Cureus. 2024 Mar 6;16(3):e55614. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55614. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Factors affecting social integration after road traffic orthopaedic injuries in Rwanda.影响卢旺达道路交通骨科损伤后社会融合的因素。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 16;4:1287980. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1287980. eCollection 2023.
7
Factor Structure of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participations for Adults in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.台湾残疾资格认定系统中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的成人活动与参与度测量的因素结构
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 13;3:879898. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.879898. eCollection 2022.
8
Exploring Factors Associated with Functional Change and Predictors of Participation Improvement-A Two Years Follow-Up on People with Depression.探讨与功能变化相关的因素及参与改善的预测因素——对抑郁症患者的两年随访。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;18(7):3439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073439.
9
Long-term outcome of children with autism who received different forms of early intervention during their preschool years: a pilot study of 15 young adults.在学龄前接受不同形式早期干预的自闭症儿童的长期结局:一项针对15名年轻成年人的试点研究。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2018 Jul 10;6(1):28-39. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2018-006. eCollection 2018.
10
Structural Validity of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participation for Children in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的台湾残疾资格评定系统中儿童活动和参与测量的结构效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6134. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176134.
西班牙五镇中年和老年人使用 WHODAS 2.0 进行残疾分析。
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jan;7(1):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Paradigm shifts in disability and health: toward more ethical public health research.残疾与健康范式转变:迈向更具伦理道德的公共卫生研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103(12):2165-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301286. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
5
Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: experiences in Taiwan.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》框架实施残疾评估和福利服务:台湾的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 14;13:416. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-416.
6
Evolution of system for disability assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Taiwanese study.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的残疾评估系统的演变:一项台湾地区的研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Nov;112(11):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
CDC grand rounds: public health practices to include persons with disabilities.疾病预防控制中心例会:将残疾人纳入公共卫生实践。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Aug 30;62(34):697-701.
8
Developing a disability determination model using a decision support system in Taiwan: a pilot study.运用决策支持系统开发台湾残障鉴定模式:先导研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Aug;112(8):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Counting disability: global and national estimation.残疾人数统计:全球和国家估计。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(13):1065-9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.720354.
10
Socioeconomic inequality in disability among adults: a multicountry study using the World Health Survey.成年人残疾的社会经济不平等:一项使用世界卫生调查的多国家研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1278-86. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301115. Epub 2013 May 16.