• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0对创伤性脑损伤和脊髓损伤患者进行功能与残疾分析。

Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0.

作者信息

Kuo Chia-Ying, Liou Tsan-Hon, Chang Kwang-Hwa, Chi Wen-Chou, Escorpizo Reuben, Yen Chia-Feng, Liao Hua-Fang, Chiou Hung-Yi, Chiu Wen-Ta, Tsai Jo-Ting

机构信息

School of Public Health, College of Public Health and Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.

Office of Medical Affairs, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 23561, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):4116-27. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404116.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph120404116
PMID:25874682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4410236/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients' function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan's national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p < 0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p < 0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)比较创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的功能与残疾情况;并阐明导致残疾的因素。我们分析了2012年9月至2013年8月间来自台湾国家残疾登记处的数据,该登记处以国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架为基础。在入选研究的2664例病例中,1316例为TBI,1348例为SCI。与SCI患者相比,TBI患者在认知、自我护理、人际关系、生活活动及社会参与方面表现较差的比例更高(所有p<0.001)。年龄、性别、损伤类型、社会经济地位、居住地点及损伤严重程度被确定为独立导致残疾的因素(所有p<0.05)。WHODAS 2.0是一种通用评估工具,适用于评估与TBI和SCI相关的复杂多面的残疾情况。需要进一步开展研究,从多学科角度验证WHODAS 2.0在TBI和SCI方面的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f1b/4410236/27c26f4508d9/ijerph-12-04116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f1b/4410236/27c26f4508d9/ijerph-12-04116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f1b/4410236/27c26f4508d9/ijerph-12-04116-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0对创伤性脑损伤和脊髓损伤患者进行功能与残疾分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):4116-27. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404116.
2
Comparing disability between traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.比较创伤性脑损伤和脊髓损伤之间的残疾程度,使用 WHODAS 2.0 的 12 项和涵盖功能和健康的世卫组织最小通用数据集。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Dec;32(12):1676-1683. doi: 10.1177/0269215518785945. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
4
WHODAS 2.0 Can Predict Institutionalization among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.WHODAS 2.0 可预测颅脑损伤患者的住院情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):1484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091484.
5
Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and the World Health Organization minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health in spinal cord injury.世界卫生组织残疾评估表和世界卫生组织脊髓损伤功能和健康通用领域最小集合在脊髓损伤中的效用。
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Jan 1;51(1):40-46. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2501.
6
Comparing functioning in spinal cord injury and in chronic spinal pain with two ICF-based instruments: WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.比较基于 ICF 的两种工具:WHODAS 2.0 和 WHO 基本通用数据集(涵盖功能和健康状况)在脊髓损伤和慢性脊髓疼痛中的功能表现。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1241-1251. doi: 10.1177/0269215519839104. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Disability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with traumatic brain injury using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and the International Classification of Functioning minimal generic set.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0和功能国际分类最小通用集,对比肌萎缩侧索硬化症与创伤性脑损伤中的残疾情况。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Sep;41(3):224-229. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000292.
8
Functioning and disability in spinal cord injury from the consumer perspective: an international qualitative study using focus groups and the ICF.从消费者角度看脊髓损伤的功能和残疾:采用国际功能、残疾和健康分类的国际定性研究
Spinal Cord. 2010 Aug;48(8):603-13. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.184. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在有手部损伤和无手部损伤的希伯来语使用者中的跨文化调适
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jun;39(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1189606. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
10
Comparing Activity and Participation between Acquired Brain Injury and Spinal-Cord Injury in Community-Dwelling People with Severe Disability Using WHODAS 2.0.使用 WHODAS 2.0 比较社区居住的重度残疾的脑损伤和脊髓损伤患者的活动和参与情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3031. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093031.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Neuroendocrine Responses and Dysregulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Following Repeated Mild Concussive Impacts and Blast Exposures in a Rat Model.大鼠模型中反复轻度脑震荡撞击和爆炸暴露后神经内分泌反应差异及下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴失调
Brain Sci. 2025 Aug 8;15(8):847. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080847.
2
A Customized Neural Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Target for Functional Disability Among Veterans With Co-Occurring Alcohol Use Disorder and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.针对同时患有酒精使用障碍和轻度创伤性脑损伤的退伍军人功能残疾的定制神经经颅磁刺激靶点:一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 23;14:e64909. doi: 10.2196/64909.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring disability and its predicting factors in a large database in Taiwan using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0在台湾的一个大型数据库中测量残疾及其预测因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 25;11(12):12148-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212148.
2
Validity and reliability of the Functioning Disability Evaluation Scale-Adult Version based on the WHODAS 2.0--36 items.基于世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)的成人版功能残疾评定量表(36项)的效度和信度
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Nov;113(11):839-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
3
Spinal cord injury due to road traffic accident in the pre-hospital phase: a grounded theory study in an Iranian context.
因道路交通事故致院前阶段脊髓损伤:伊朗背景下的扎根理论研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;12:1353342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1353342. eCollection 2024.
4
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule versus Functional Independence Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury.世界卫生组织残疾评估表与创伤性脑损伤中的功能独立性测量。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Nov 30;55:jrm16274. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.16274.
5
Antidiabetic Drugs Can Reduce the Harmful Impact of Chronic Smoking on Post-Traumatic Brain Injuries.抗糖尿病药物可降低慢性吸烟对创伤性脑损伤的有害影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 25;24(7):6219. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076219.
6
Circular RNA METTL9 contributes to neuroinflammation following traumatic brain injury by complexing with astrocytic SND1.环状 RNA METTL9 通过与星形胶质细胞 SND1 复合促进创伤性脑损伤后的神经炎症。
J Neuroinflammation. 2023 Feb 17;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02716-x.
7
Factor Structure of an ICF-Based Measure of Activity and Participations for Adults in Taiwan's Disability Eligibility Determination System.台湾残疾资格认定系统中基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类的成人活动与参与度测量的因素结构
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 May 13;3:879898. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.879898. eCollection 2022.
8
Neuroprotective effect of geraniol on neurological disorders: a review article.香叶醇对神经障碍的神经保护作用:综述文章。
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Nov;49(11):10865-10874. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07755-w. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
9
Long-term physical and psychological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-protocol for a national cross-sectional survey of survivors and their relatives (the DANCAS survey).院外心脏骤停协议后幸存者及其亲属的全国横断面调查(DANCAS 调查)的长期身体和心理结果
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 2;11(4):e045668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045668.
10
Elevated hippocampal CD24 in astrocytes participates in neural regeneration possibly via activating SHP2/ERK pathway after experimental traumatic brain injury in mice.实验性创伤性脑损伤后,星形胶质细胞中升高的海马CD24可能通过激活SHP2/ERK通路参与小鼠的神经再生。
Am J Transl Res. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):6395-6408. eCollection 2020.
A comparison of participation outcome measures and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Sets for traumatic brain injury.
创伤性脑损伤参与结局测量指标与国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集的比较。
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):108-16. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1257.
4
Implementing disability evaluation and welfare services based on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: experiences in Taiwan.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》框架实施残疾评估和福利服务:台湾的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 14;13:416. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-416.
5
Evolution of system for disability assessment based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: A Taiwanese study.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的残疾评估系统的演变:一项台湾地区的研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Nov;112(11):691-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
6
Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.与 ICF 参与和活动筛查量表以及 WHO 残疾评估量表 II 相比,评估康复参与的乌得勒支量表在脊髓损伤患者中的应用比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.236. Epub 2013 Sep 2.
7
Developing a disability determination model using a decision support system in Taiwan: a pilot study.运用决策支持系统开发台湾残障鉴定模式:先导研究。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Aug;112(8):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
8
Secondary health conditions in persons with a spinal cord injury for at least 10 years: design of a comprehensive long-term cross-sectional study.脊髓损伤至少 10 年者的继发性健康状况:一项全面的长期横断面研究设计。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(13):1104-10. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.712196. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版(WHODAS II):在脊髓损伤人群中测量活动和参与的信度和效度。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 Sep;44(9):747-55. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1016.
10
Functional outcome following rehabilitation in chronic severe traumatic brain injury patients: A prospective study.慢性重度创伤性脑损伤患者康复后的功能结局:一项前瞻性研究。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2012 Apr;15(2):120-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.94995.