Sakai Eiji, Endo Hiroki, Taguri Masataka, Kawamura Harunobu, Taniguchi Leo, Hata Yasuo, Ezuka Akiko, Nagase Hajime, Kessoku Takaomi, Ishii Ken, Arimoto Jun, Yamada Eiji, Ohkubo Hidenori, Higurashi Takuma, Koide Tomoko, Nonaka Takashi, Takahashi Hirokazu, Nakajima Atsushi
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fuku-ura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Department of Endoscopy Center, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;14:200. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0200-3.
Small bowel angioectasia is reported as the most common cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Although the safety and efficacy of endoscopic treatment have been demonstrated, rebleeding rates are relatively high. To establish therapeutic and follow-up guidelines, we investigated the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small bowel angioectasia.
A total of 68 patients were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients had undergone CE examination, and subsequent control of bleeding, where needed, was accomplished by endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. Based on the follow-up data, the rebleeding rate was compared between patients who had/had not undergone endoscopic treatment. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazard regression model to identify the predictors of rebleeding. We defined the OGIB as controlled if there was no further overt bleeding within 6 months and the hemoglobin level had not fallen below 10 g/dl by the time of the final examination.
The overall rebleeding rate over a median follow-up duration of 30.5 months (interquartile range 16.5-47.0) was 33.8% (23/68 cases). The cumulative risk of rebleeding tended to be lower in the patients who had undergone endoscopic treatment than in those who had not undergone endoscopic treatment, however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.14). In the majority of patients with rebleeding (18/23, 78.3%), the bleeding was controlled by the end of the follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis identified presence of multiple lesions (≥3) (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.30-11.3, P = 0.02) as the only significant independent predictor of rebleeding.
In most cases, bleeding can be controlled by repeated endoscopic treatment. Careful follow-up is needed for patients with multiple lesions, presence of which is considered as a significant risk factor for rebleeding.
小肠血管扩张被报道为不明原因胃肠道出血患者最常见的出血原因。尽管内镜治疗的安全性和有效性已得到证实,但再出血率相对较高。为制定治疗和随访指南,我们调查了小肠血管扩张患者再出血的长期结局和临床预测因素。
本研究共回顾性纳入68例患者。所有患者均接受了胶囊内镜检查,必要时通过内镜氩离子凝固术控制出血。根据随访数据,比较接受/未接受内镜治疗患者的再出血率。使用Cox比例风险回归模型进行多因素分析,以确定再出血的预测因素。如果在6个月内没有进一步的明显出血,且在最后一次检查时血红蛋白水平未降至10g/dl以下,我们将不明原因胃肠道出血定义为得到控制。
在中位随访期30.5个月(四分位间距16.5 - 47.0)内,总体再出血率为33.8%(23/68例)。接受内镜治疗的患者再出血的累积风险倾向于低于未接受内镜治疗的患者,然而,差异未达到统计学意义(P = 0.14)。在大多数再出血患者(18/23,78.3%)中,出血在随访期结束时得到控制。多因素回归分析确定多发病变(≥3个)(OR 3.82;95%CI 1.30 - 11.3,P = 0.02)是再出血唯一显著的独立预测因素。
在大多数情况下,通过重复内镜治疗可控制出血。对于有多发病变的患者需要仔细随访,多发病变被认为是再出血的一个重要危险因素。