Suppr超能文献

胶囊内镜检查阴性的不明原因胃肠道出血患者可靠:长期随访中再发出血。

Negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding reliable: recurrence of bleeding on long-term follow-up.

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 28;19(28):4520-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i28.4520.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the rate of recurrent bleeding of the small bowel in patients with obscure bleeding already undergone capsule endoscopy (CE) with negative results.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records related to 696 consecutive CE performed from December 2002 to January 2011, focusing our attention on patients with recurrence of obscure bleeding and negative CE. Evaluating the patient follow-up, we analyzed the recurrence rate of obscure bleeding in patient with a negative CE. Actuarial rates of rebleeding during follow-up were calculated, and factors associated with rebleeding were assessed through an univariate and multivariate analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of negative CE were calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seven out of 696 (29.7%) CE studies resulted negative in patient with obscure/overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Overall, 489 CE (70.2%) were positive studies. The median follow-up was 24 mo (range 12-36 mo). During follow-up, recurrence of obscure bleeding was observed only in 34 out of 207 negative CE patients (16.4%); 26 out of 34 with obscure overt bleeding and 8 out of 34 with obscure occult bleeding. The younger age (< 65 years) and the onset of bleeding such as melena are independent risk factors of rebleeding after a negative CE (OR = 2.6703, 95%CI: 1.1651-6.1202, P = 0.0203; OR 4.7718, 95%CI: 1.9739-11.5350, P = 0.0005). The rebleeding rate (CE+ vs CE-) was 16.4% vs 45.1% (χ(2) test, P = 0.00001). The sensitivity, specificity, and PPV and NPV were 93.8%, 100%, 100%, 80.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and negative CE had a significantly lower rebleeding rate, and further invasive investigations can be deferred.

摘要

目的

评估胶囊内镜(CE)检查结果阴性的不明原因消化道出血患者小肠再出血的发生率。

方法

我们回顾了 2002 年 12 月至 2011 年 1 月期间连续进行的 696 例 CE 相关的病历,重点关注 CE 结果阴性但再次出现不明原因出血的患者。通过对患者的随访评估,分析 CE 阴性患者的不明原因出血复发率。计算随访期间再出血的累积发生率,并通过单因素和多因素分析评估与再出血相关的因素。P 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。计算阴性 CE 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

297 例(29.7%)CE 检查结果为不明原因/显性胃肠道出血患者的 CE 检查结果为阴性。总的来说,489 例(70.2%)CE 检查结果为阳性。中位随访时间为 24 个月(范围 12-36 个月)。在随访期间,仅在 207 例阴性 CE 患者中有 34 例(16.4%)出现不明原因出血复发;其中 26 例为显性出血,8 例为隐匿性出血。年轻(<65 岁)和出血起病如黑便为阴性 CE 后再出血的独立危险因素(OR=2.6703,95%CI:1.1651-6.1202,P=0.0203;OR=4.7718,95%CI:1.9739-11.5350,P=0.0005)。再出血率(CE+ vs CE-)为 16.4% vs 45.1%(卡方检验,P=0.00001)。灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 93.8%、100%、100%、80.1%。

结论

不明原因消化道出血且 CE 检查结果阴性的患者再出血率显著较低,可以延迟进一步的有创检查。

相似文献

2
Long-term outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar 14;19(10):1632-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i10.1632.
5
Frequency of rebleeding events in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding with negative capsule endoscopy.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;28(5):834-40. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12145.
6
Long-term outcome in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy.
J Dig Dis. 2015 Mar;16(3):125-34. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12222.
7
Long-term outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;39(1):165-171. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16379. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
8
Impact of fecal occult blood on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: observational study.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):326-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.326.
9
Small bowel capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: normalcy is not reassuring.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Aug;26(8):927-32. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000135.
10
Negative capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding predicts low rebleeding rates.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Dec;68(6):1122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.06.054.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Factors of Significant Findings on Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Suspected Small Bowel Bleeding.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;14(21):2352. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212352.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Negative Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 4;9:772954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.772954. eCollection 2022.
6
Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice: Has Anything Changed Over 13 Years?
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Sep;63(9):2244-2250. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5101-9. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
The Importance of Alternative Diagnostic Modalities in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Tumors After a Negative Capsule Endoscopy.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 26;22(3):112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.01.008. eCollection 2015 May-Jun.
9
Evidence-Based Guide on Capsule Endoscopy for Small Bowel Bleeding.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017 Feb;13(2):88-93.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency of rebleeding events in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding with negative capsule endoscopy.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;28(5):834-40. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12145.
2
Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy: results of a one-year follow-up study.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Nov;34(11):606-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
5
Long-term follow-up of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after negative capsule endoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1224-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00565.x.
6
ASGE Technology Status Evaluation Report: wireless capsule endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4):539-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.014.
7
Capsule endoscopy in 2005: facts and perspectives.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;20(1):23-39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.08.002.
9
Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Oct 1;22(7):595-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02625.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验