Woods G L, Thiele G M
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68105.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jun;91(6):695-700. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/91.6.695.
Two methods for the detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in 457 clinical specimens were compared: (1) centrifugal inoculation of MRC-5 cells seeded on coverslips in 24-well plates and staining with a monoclonal antibody to CMV early nuclear antigen after incubation for both 16-18 hours (EA-1) and four days (EA-4); and (2) conventional tube cell culture. CMV was identified in 50 (11%) specimens from 34 different patients. EA-1 and EA-4 had positive results for CMV in 32 (64%) and 36 (73%) of the specimens, respectively. Positive inclusions were present on only one coverslip in 31% of the cases by EA-1 and in 10% by EA-4. The number of inclusions was not necessarily predictive of tissue culture results. CMV was recovered by conventional tissue culture from 27 specimens (54%) after an average of 17 days (range, 6-26 days). One specimen, positive for CMV by EA-4, yielded herpes simplex virus (HSV), and from 9 of the 407 CMV-negative specimens, another virus was recovered: HSV from 6 specimens and varicella zoster virus, adenovirus, and enterovirus from one specimen each. CMV was detected in significantly more specimens by EA-4 than by tissue culture (P = 0.037). However, there was no significant difference in the detection of CMV between EA-1 and EA-4 or between EA-1 and conventional culture. The authors' data suggest that for maximum recovery of CMV from clinical specimens, both an early antigen assay and conventional tissue culture should be performed. For urine specimens it appears that inoculation of two coverslips followed by staining after overnight incubation is adequate. To optimize the yield of the early antigen assay when testing specimens other than urine, the authors recommend inoculating three coverslips, two of which should be stained after overnight incubation, and, if necessary, the third coverslip could be stained after a more prolonged incubation period.
对457份临床标本中检测巨细胞病毒(CMV)的两种方法进行了比较:(1)将接种于24孔板盖玻片上的MRC - 5细胞进行离心接种,在孵育16 - 18小时(EA - 1)和4天后,用抗CMV早期核抗原的单克隆抗体染色;(2)传统的试管细胞培养。在来自34名不同患者的50份(11%)标本中鉴定出CMV。EA - 1和EA - 4分别在32份(64%)和36份(73%)标本中对CMV呈阳性结果。通过EA - 1检测,31%的病例中仅在一张盖玻片上出现阳性包涵体,而通过EA - 4检测,这一比例为10%。包涵体的数量不一定能预测组织培养结果。通过传统组织培养,平均17天(范围6 - 26天)后从27份标本(54%)中分离出CMV。一份通过EA - 4检测为CMV阳性的标本培养出单纯疱疹病毒(HSV),在407份CMV阴性标本中的9份中,分离出另一种病毒:6份标本中分离出HSV,1份标本中分别分离出水痘带状疱疹病毒、腺病毒和肠道病毒。通过EA - 4检测出的CMV标本显著多于组织培养法(P = 0.037)。然而,EA - 1与EA - 4之间或EA - 1与传统培养法之间在CMV检测上没有显著差异。作者的数据表明,为了从临床标本中最大程度地分离出CMV,应同时进行早期抗原检测和传统组织培养。对于尿液标本,似乎接种两张盖玻片,过夜孵育后染色就足够了。为了在检测除尿液以外的标本时优化早期抗原检测的产量,作者建议接种三张盖玻片,其中两张过夜孵育后染色,如有必要,第三张盖玻片可在更长孵育期后染色。