Mendes Rosilda, Plaza Veronica, Wallerstein Nina
Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Campus Baixada Santista, Brazil.
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Glob Health Promot. 2016 Mar;23(1):61-74. doi: 10.1177/1757975914550255. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
Health promotion programs are commonly viewed as value-free initiatives which seek to improve health, often through behavior change. An opposing view has begun to emerge that health promotion efforts, especially ones seeking to impact health policy and social determinants of health, are vulnerable to political contexts and may depend on who is in power at the time. This community-based participatory research study attempts to understand these interactions by applying a conceptual model focused on the power context, diverse stakeholder roles within this context, and the relationship of political levers and other change strategies to the sustainability of health promotion interventions aimed at health policy change. We present a case study of a health promotion coalition, New Mexico for Responsible Sex Education (NMRSE), as an example of power dynamics and change processes. Formed in 2005 in response to federal policies mandating abstinence-only education, NMRSE includes community activists, health promotion staff from the New Mexico Department of Health, and policy-maker allies. Applying an adapted Mayer's 'power analysis' instrument, we conducted semi-structured stakeholder interviews and triangulated political-context analyses from the perspective of the stakeholders.We identified multiple understandings of sustainability and health promotion policy change, including: the importance of diverse stakeholders working together in coalition and social networks; their distinct positions of power within their political contexts; the role of science versus advocacy in change processes; the particular challenges for public sector health promotion professionals; and other facilitators versus barriers to action. One problem that emerged consisted of the challenges for state employees to engage in health promotion advocacy due to limitations imposed on their activities by state and federal policies. This investigation's results include a refined conceptual model, a power-analysis instrument, and new understandings of the intersection of power and stakeholder strategies in the sustainability of health promotion and health in all policies.
健康促进项目通常被视为无价值倾向的倡议,旨在通过行为改变等方式改善健康状况。一种相反的观点开始出现,即健康促进努力,尤其是那些试图影响健康政策和健康的社会决定因素的努力,容易受到政治环境的影响,并且可能取决于当时掌权的人。这项基于社区的参与性研究试图通过应用一个概念模型来理解这些相互作用,该模型关注权力背景、在此背景下不同利益相关者的角色,以及政治杠杆和其他变革策略与旨在推动健康政策变革的健康促进干预措施可持续性之间的关系。我们以一个健康促进联盟——新墨西哥州负责任性教育组织(NMRSE)为例,介绍权力动态和变革过程的案例研究。NMRSE于2005年成立,以应对联邦政府只强调禁欲教育的政策,其成员包括社区活动家、新墨西哥州卫生部的健康促进工作人员以及政策制定者盟友。我们应用经过改编的梅耶“权力分析”工具,进行了半结构化的利益相关者访谈,并从利益相关者的角度对政治背景分析进行了三角验证。我们确定了对可持续性和健康促进政策变革的多种理解,包括:不同利益相关者在联盟和社会网络中共同合作的重要性;他们在各自政治背景中的不同权力地位;科学与倡导在变革过程中的作用;公共部门健康促进专业人员面临的特殊挑战;以及其他行动的促进因素与障碍。出现的一个问题是,由于州和联邦政策对其活动的限制,州政府雇员在参与健康促进倡导方面面临挑战。这项调查的结果包括一个完善的概念模型、一种权力分析工具,以及对权力与利益相关者策略在健康促进可持续性和所有政策中的健康方面的交叉点的新理解。