• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受微创子宫切除术患者的瘢痕评估

Scar assessment for patients undergoing minimal invasive hysterectomy.

作者信息

McCarus Steven D

机构信息

Florida Hospital Celebration Health Celebration, Florida.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:150-6.

PMID:25433344
Abstract

Surgical innovations have positively impacted the way hysterectomy procedures are performed by surgeons and the results experienced by patients. Patients with benign disease requiring a hysterectomy are no longer subjected to living with a large incisional scar that was common only 20 years ago. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery, surgeons can now provide hysterectomy patients with cosmetically pleasing results. To better understand the impact of surgical scars from hysterectomy incisions, 200 subjects answered a surgical incision questionnaire. Cosmetic issues (i.e., hysterectomy scars) were self-reported as important in 93% of subjects, of which 24% indicated this was extremely important. Of these same subjects, 11% indicated they were extremely bothered about their current scars. Subject interest in surgery without scars was 92% and 45% noted extreme interest. Concern about the surgical incision appearance was cited by 85% of subjects. Familiarity about incisions associated with the different hysterectomy procedures resulted in 26% of subjects who were not at all familiar. Low placed incision locations were considered cosmetically superior by 86% of the subjects. The least desirable incision location was above the belly button (69%) whereas the most desirable incision location was below the bikini line (68%). Discussion about the location, number, and incision size prior to surgery was cited to be important by 93% of subjects. Study subjects show there is value in discussing the number and placement of surgical incisions prior to surgery. Cosmesis of the surgical scars is a concern for many women, but most subjects knew little about the hysterectomy incision options. Based on these findings, surgeons can improve patient satisfaction scores by discussing incisional placement and surgical options prior to the procedure.

摘要

手术创新对外科医生进行子宫切除术的方式以及患者所获得的结果产生了积极影响。需要进行子宫切除术的良性疾病患者不再需要忍受仅在20年前还很常见的大切口疤痕。随着微创手术的出现,外科医生现在能够为子宫切除患者提供美观效果良好的手术结果。为了更好地了解子宫切除手术切口的手术疤痕的影响,200名受试者回答了一份手术切口问卷。93%的受试者自我报告称美容问题(即子宫切除疤痕)很重要,其中24%表示这极其重要。在这些受试者中,11%表示他们对自己目前的疤痕极其困扰。92%的受试者对无疤痕手术感兴趣,45%表示极度感兴趣。85%的受试者提到了对手术切口外观的担忧。26%的受试者对与不同子宫切除手术相关的切口完全不熟悉。86%的受试者认为低位切口在美观上更具优势。最不理想的切口位置是肚脐上方(69%),而最理想的切口位置是比基尼线以下(68%)。93%的受试者提到在手术前讨论切口位置、数量和切口大小很重要。研究对象表明,在手术前讨论手术切口的数量和位置是有价值的。手术疤痕的美观是许多女性关心的问题,但大多数受试者对子宫切除手术的切口选择知之甚少。基于这些发现,外科医生可以通过在手术前讨论切口位置和手术选择来提高患者满意度评分。

相似文献

1
Scar assessment for patients undergoing minimal invasive hysterectomy.接受微创子宫切除术患者的瘢痕评估
Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:150-6.
2
Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.腋窝切口与乳房下皱襞切口隆胸术后瘢痕评估:中国患者的长期随访
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):699-706. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0671-4. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
3
McCarus Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: 20 Years' Experience-Lessons Learned.麦卡勒斯微创子宫切除术:20年经验——经验教训
Surg Technol Int. 2018 Nov 11;33:207-214.
4
Robot-assisted Sistrunk's operation, total thyroidectomy, and neck dissection via a transaxillary and retroauricular (TARA) approach in papillary carcinoma arising in thyroglossal duct cyst and thyroid gland.经腋后(TARA)入路机器人辅助施行 Sistrunk 手术、甲状腺全切除术和颈淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状舌管囊肿和甲状腺起源的乳头状癌
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4259-61. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2674-y. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
5
Outcomes of Cutaneous Scar Revision During Surgical Implant Removal in Children with Cerebral Palsy.脑瘫患儿手术植入物取出过程中皮肤瘢痕修复的结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 17;98(16):1351-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01418.
6
Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery.妇科手术中腹部切口美容效果的患者偏好。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
7
Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study.微创与传统入路甲状旁腺切除术和甲状腺切除术手术中客观与主观瘢痕美学:一项配对队列研究
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jan;134(1):85-93. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.1.85.
8
Transverse or longitudinal? A survey of volar wrist incision preferences.横切口还是纵切口?掌侧腕部切口选择偏好的调查。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Oct;61(10):548-550. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020023. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
9
Scar perceptions after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: comparison of minimal and conventional approaches.甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术后的疤痕感知:微创与传统方法的比较。
Surgery. 2013 Mar;153(3):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
[Assesment of selected parameters depending on the size of abdominal wall incision in patients subjected to minilaparotomy due to benign gynaecological diseases].[因良性妇科疾病接受小切口剖腹术患者腹壁切口大小对选定参数的评估]
Ginekol Pol. 2008 Mar;79(3):192-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing Dermatologic Effects of Gender-Affirming Therapy in Transgender Adolescents.处理跨性别青少年性别肯定治疗的皮肤学影响
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2022 Oct 7;13:93-106. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S344078. eCollection 2022.
2
Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis.达芬奇单孔和多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者手术满意度:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):473-481. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01269-6. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
Quality of life and cosmetic result of single-port access endoscopic thyroidectomy via axillary approach in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
甲状腺乳头状癌患者经腋窝入路单孔腔镜甲状腺切除术的生活质量及美容效果
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Jul 4;9:4053-9. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S99980. eCollection 2016.