Henegar Cassidy E, Westreich Daniel, Maskew Mhairi, Brookhart M Alan, Miller William C, Majuba Pappie, Van Rie Annelies
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA,
AIDS Behav. 2015 Apr;19(4):612-8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0953-2.
We compared multiple pharmacy refill-based adherence indicators for antiretroviral therapy, as well as thresholds for defining non-adherent behavior, based on ability to predict virological failure. A total of 29,937 pharmacy visits with corresponding viral load assessments were contributed by 8,695 patients attending a large clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. Indicators based on pill coverage and timing of refill pickup performed comparably using the strictest thresholds for adherence [100 % pill coverage: odds ratio (OR) (95 % confidence interval (CI)) : 1.26 (1.15, 1.39); prescription picked up on or before scheduled refill date: 1.27 (1.16,1.38)]. For both types of indicators, the association between non-adherence and virological failure increased as the threshold defining adherent behavior was lowered. All measures demonstrated high specificity (range 84-98 %), but low sensitivity (5-19 %). In this setting, patients identified as non-adherent using pharmacy-based indicators are likely correctly classified and in need of interventions to improve compliance. Pharmacy based measures alone, however, are inadequate for identifying most cases of nonadherence.
我们基于预测病毒学失败的能力,比较了多种抗逆转录病毒疗法基于药房再填充的依从性指标,以及定义不依从行为的阈值。南非约翰内斯堡一家大型诊所的8695名患者提供了总共29937次药房就诊及相应的病毒载量评估。使用最严格的依从性阈值时,基于药丸覆盖情况和再填充取药时间的指标表现相当[100%药丸覆盖:比值比(OR)(95%置信区间(CI)):1.26(1.15,1.39);在预定再填充日期或之前取到处方:1.27(1.16,1.38)]。对于这两种指标类型,随着定义依从行为的阈值降低,不依从与病毒学失败之间的关联增加。所有测量方法均显示出高特异性(范围84 - 98%),但敏感性低(5 - 19%)。在这种情况下,使用基于药房指标确定为不依从的患者可能被正确分类,并且需要干预措施来提高依从性。然而,仅基于药房的测量方法不足以识别大多数不依从情况。