Rowse Phillip G, Ruparel Raaj K, AlJamal Yazan N, Abdelsattar Jad M, Heller Stephanie F, Farley David R
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.
J Surg Educ. 2014 Nov-Dec;71(6):e53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.014.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of a palpable cervical lymph node is a straightforward procedure that should be safely performed by educated general surgery (GS) trainees. Retention of technical skill is suspect, unless sequential learning experiences are provided. However, voluntary learning experiences are no guarantee that trainees will actually use the resource.
A 3-minute objective structured assessment of technical skill-type station was created to assess GS trainee performance using FNA. Objective criteria were developed and a checklist was generated (perfect score = 24). Following abysmal performance of 11 postgraduate year (PGY)-4 trainees on the FNA station of our semiannual surgical skills assessment ("X-Games"), we provided all GS residents with electronic access to a 90-second YouTube video clip demonstrating proper FNA technique. PGY-2 (n = 11) and PGY-3 (n = 10) residents subsequently were tested on FNA technique 5 and 12 days later, respectively.
All 32 trainees completed the station in less than 3 minutes. Overall scores ranged from 4 to 24 (mean = 14.9). PGY-4 residents assessed before the creation of the video clip scored lowest (range: 4-18, mean = 11.4). PGY-3 residents (range: 10-22, mean = 17.8) and PGY-2 residents (range: 10-24, mean = 15.8) subsequently scored higher (p < 0.05). Ten residents admitted watching the 90-second FNA video clip and scored higher (mean = 21.7) than the 11 residents that admitted they did not watch the clip (mean = 13.1, p < 0.001). Of the 11 trainees who did not watch the video, 6 claimed they did not have time, and 5 felt it would not be useful to them.
Overall performance of FNA was poor in 32 midlevel GS residents. However, a 90-second video clip demonstrating proper FNA technique viewed less than 2 weeks before the examination significantly elevated scores. Half of trainees given the chance to learn online did not take the opportunity to view the video clip. Although preemptive learning is effective, future efforts should attempt to improve self-directed learning habits of trainees and evaluate actual long-term skill retention.
对可触及的颈部淋巴结进行细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)是一项简单的操作,受过培训的普通外科(GS)住院医师应能安全地完成。除非提供连续的学习体验,否则技术技能的保持情况令人怀疑。然而,自愿的学习体验并不能保证住院医师会实际利用这些资源。
创建了一个3分钟的客观结构化技术技能评估型站点,以评估GS住院医师使用FNA的操作表现。制定了客观标准并生成了一份检查表(满分 = 24分)。在我们半年一次的外科技能评估(“X游戏”)的FNA站点上,11名四年级住院医师(PGY-4)表现极差,之后我们为所有GS住院医师提供了一段90秒的YouTube视频剪辑的电子访问权限,该视频展示了正确的FNA技术。PGY-2(n = 11)和PGY-3(n = 10)住院医师随后分别在5天和12天后接受了FNA技术测试。
所有32名住院医师均在3分钟内完成了该站点的测试。总体得分范围为4至24分(平均 = 14.9分)。在视频剪辑创建之前接受评估的PGY-4住院医师得分最低(范围:4 - 18分,平均 = 11.4分)。PGY-3住院医师(范围:10 - 22分,平均 = 17.8分)和PGY-2住院医师(范围:10 - 24分,平均 = 15.8分)随后得分更高(p < 0.05)。10名住院医师承认观看了90秒的FNA视频剪辑,其得分(平均 = 21.7分)高于11名承认未观看该剪辑的住院医师(平均 = 13.1分,p < 0.001)。在11名未观看视频的住院医师中,6人声称他们没有时间,5人认为该视频对他们没用。
32名中级GS住院医师FNA的总体表现较差。然而,在考试前不到2周观看一段展示正确FNA技术的90秒视频剪辑显著提高了分数。有机会在线学习的住院医师中有一半没有利用这个机会观看视频剪辑。虽然预防性学习是有效的,但未来的努力应尝试改善住院医师的自主学习习惯,并评估实际的长期技能保持情况。