Suppr超能文献

美国与国际医学毕业生在普通外科住院医师培训中的客观评估数据比较。

A Comparison of Objective Assessment Data for the United States and International Medical Graduates in a General Surgery Residency.

作者信息

Cardenas Lara Francisco, Naik Nimesh D, Pandian T K, Gas Becca L, Strubel Suzanne, Cadeliña Rachel, Heller Stephanie F, Farley David R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare objective assessment scores between international medical graduates (IMGs) and United States Medical Graduates. Scores of residents who completed a preliminary year, who later matched into a categorical position, were compared to those who matched directly into a categorical position at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester.

DESIGN

Postgraduate year (PGY) 1 to 5 residents participate in a biannual multistation, OSCE-style assessment event as part of our surgical training program. Assessment data were, retrospectively, reviewed and analyzed from 2008 to 2016 for PGY-1 and from 2013 to 2016 for PGY 2 to 5 categorical residents.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Categorical PGY 1 to 5 General Surgery (GS) residents at Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN.

RESULTS

A total of 86 GS residents were identified. Twenty-one residents (1 United States Medical Graduates [USMG] and 20 IMGs) completed a preliminary GS year, before matching into a categorical position and 68 (58 USMGs and 10 IMGs) residents, who matched directly into a categorical position, were compared. Mean scores (%) for the summer and winter multistation assessments were higher for PGY-1 trainees with a preliminary year than those without (summer: 59 vs. 37, p < 0.001; winter: 69 vs. 61, p = 0.05). Summer and winter PGY-2 scores followed the same pattern (74 vs. 64, p < 0.01; 85 vs. 71, p < 0.01). For the PGY 3 to 5 assessments, differences in scores between these groups were not observed. IMGs and USMGs scored equivalently on all assessments. Overall, junior residents showed greater score improvement between tests than their senior colleagues (mean score increase: PGY 1-2 = 18 vs. PGY 3-5 = 3, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents with a previous preliminary GS year at our institution scored higher on initial assessments compared to trainees with no prior GS training at our institution. The scoring advantage of an added preliminary year decreased as trainees progressed through residency.

摘要

目的

比较国际医学毕业生(IMGs)和美国医学毕业生的客观评估分数。将完成预实习年、随后匹配到专科职位的住院医师的分数,与直接匹配到罗切斯特梅奥诊所专科职位的住院医师的分数进行比较。

设计

作为我们外科培训项目的一部分,研究生第1至5年的住院医师每半年参加一次多站式、客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)风格的评估活动。对2008年至2016年研究生第1年以及2013年至2016年研究生第2至5年专科住院医师的评估数据进行回顾性审查和分析。

地点

学术医疗中心。

参与者

明尼苏达州罗切斯特梅奥诊所的第1至5年普通外科(GS)专科住院医师。

结果

共确定了86名GS住院医师。21名住院医师(1名美国医学毕业生[USMG]和20名IMGs)在匹配到专科职位之前完成了普通外科预实习年,对68名(58名USMGs和10名IMGs)直接匹配到专科职位的住院医师进行了比较。有预实习年的研究生第1年受训者在夏季和冬季多站式评估中的平均分数(%)高于没有预实习年的受训者(夏季:59对37,p<0.001;冬季:69对61,p = 0.05)。研究生第2年夏季和冬季的分数遵循相同模式(74对64,p<0.01;85对71,p<0.01)。在研究生第3至5年的评估中,未观察到这些组之间的分数差异。IMGs和USMGs在所有评估中的得分相当。总体而言,初级住院医师在各次测试之间的分数提高幅度大于高级同事(平均分数提高:研究生第1 - 2年 = 18对研究生第3 - 5年 = 3,p<0.001)。

结论

与在我们机构没有普通外科前期培训的受训者相比,在我们机构有过普通外科预实习年的住院医师在初始评估中得分更高。随着受训者在住院医师培训过程中的进展,额外预实习年的得分优势逐渐降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验