van Dillen Lotte F, Harris Lasana T, van Dijk Wilco W, Rotteveel Mark
a Institute of Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition , Leiden University , Leiden , the Netherlands.
b Institute of Psychology , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(8):1382-400. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.982514. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
In the present research we examined whether the psychological meaning of people's categorisation goals affects facial muscle activity in response to facial expressions of emotion. We had participants associate eye colour (blue, brown) with either a personality trait (extraversion) or a physical trait (light frequency) and asked them to use these associations in a speeded categorisation task of angry, disgusted, happy and neutral faces while assessing participants' response times and facial muscle activity. We predicted that participants would respond differentially to the emotional faces when the categorisation criteria allowed for inferences about a target's thoughts, feelings or behaviour (i.e., when categorising extraversion), but not when these lacked any social meaning (i.e., when categorising light frequency). Indeed, emotional faces triggered facial reactions to facial expressions when participants categorised extraversion, but not when they categorised light frequency. In line with this, only when categorising extraversion did participants' response times indicate a negativity bias replicating previous results. Together, these findings provide further evidence for the contextual nature of people's selective responses to the emotions expressed by others.
在本研究中,我们考察了人们分类目标的心理意义是否会影响其对面部表情情绪的面部肌肉活动。我们让参与者将眼睛颜色(蓝色、棕色)与一种人格特质(外向性)或一种身体特质(光频率)联系起来,并要求他们在对愤怒、厌恶、高兴和中性面孔的快速分类任务中运用这些联系,同时评估参与者的反应时间和面部肌肉活动。我们预测,当分类标准允许推断目标的思想、情感或行为时(即对外向性进行分类时),参与者对情绪面孔的反应会有所不同,但当这些标准缺乏任何社会意义时(即对光频率进行分类时)则不然。事实上,当参与者对外向性进行分类时,情绪面孔会引发对面部表情的面部反应,但对光频率进行分类时则不会。与此一致的是,只有在对外向性进行分类时,参与者的反应时间才显示出与先前结果一致的消极偏差。总之,这些发现为人们对他人所表达情绪的选择性反应的情境性质提供了进一步的证据。