Suppr超能文献

KDEF-PT:愤怒、中性和快乐面孔的效价、情感强度、熟悉度及吸引力评分

KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.

作者信息

Garrido Margarida V, Prada Marília

机构信息

Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS - IUL, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02181. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces (KDEF) is one of the most widely used human facial expressions database. Almost a decade after the original validation study (Goeleven et al., 2008), we present subjective rating norms for a sub-set of 210 pictures which depict 70 models (half female) each displaying an angry, happy and neutral facial expressions. Our main goals were to provide an additional and updated validation to this database, using a sample from a different nationality ( = 155 Portuguese students, = 23.73 years old, = 7.24) and to extend the number of subjective dimensions used to evaluate each image. Specifically, participants reported emotional labeling (forced-choice task) and evaluated the emotional intensity and valence of the expression, as well as the attractiveness and familiarity of the model (7-points rating scales). Overall, results show that happy faces obtained the highest ratings across evaluative dimensions and emotion labeling accuracy. Female (vs. male) models were perceived as more attractive, familiar and positive. The sex of the model also moderated the accuracy of emotional labeling and ratings of different facial expressions. Each picture of the set was categorized as low, moderate, or high for each dimension. Normative data for each stimulus (hits proportion, means, standard deviations, and confidence intervals per evaluative dimension) is available as supplementary material (available at https://osf.io/fvc4m/).

摘要

卡罗林斯卡定向情感面孔(KDEF)是使用最为广泛的人类面部表情数据库之一。在最初的验证研究(Goeleven等人,2008年)开展近十年后,我们给出了210张图片子集的主观评分规范,这些图片描绘了70个模特(一半为女性),每个模特分别展示愤怒、快乐和中性的面部表情。我们的主要目标是使用来自不同国籍的样本(155名葡萄牙学生,平均年龄23.73岁,标准差7.24)为该数据库提供额外的更新验证,并扩展用于评估每张图片的主观维度数量。具体而言,参与者报告情感标签(强制选择任务),并评估表情的情感强度和效价,以及模特的吸引力和熟悉度(7点量表)。总体而言,结果表明快乐面孔在各个评估维度和情感标签准确性方面获得了最高评分。女性(与男性相比)模特被认为更具吸引力、更熟悉且更积极。模特的性别也调节了情感标签的准确性和不同面部表情的评分。该集合中的每张图片在每个维度上都被分类为低、中或高。每个刺激的规范数据(每个评估维度的命中比例、均值、标准差和置信区间)可作为补充材料获取(可在https://osf.io/fvc4m/上获取)。

相似文献

1
KDEF-PT: Valence, Emotional Intensity, Familiarity and Attractiveness Ratings of Angry, Neutral, and Happy Faces.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02181. eCollection 2017.
2
The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1343-1360. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0790-5.
3
Subjective ratings and emotional recognition of children's facial expressions from the CAFE set.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 27;13(12):e0209644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209644. eCollection 2018.
4
Human Observers and Automated Assessment of Dynamic Emotional Facial Expressions: KDEF-dyn Database Validation.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 26;9:2052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02052. eCollection 2018.
5
You look pretty happy: Attractiveness moderates emotion perception.
Emotion. 2019 Sep;19(6):1070-1080. doi: 10.1037/emo0000513. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
7
Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
Prototypicality and intensity of emotional faces using an anchor-point method.
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E7. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.9.
9
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
10
The influence of facial sex cues on emotional expression categorization is not fixed.
Emotion. 2017 Feb;17(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037/emo0000208. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional impact of AI-generated vs. human-composed music in audiovisual media: A biometric and self-report study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326498. eCollection 2025.
2
"Sentio ergo est": Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception.
Perception. 2025 Jan;54(1):3-31. doi: 10.1177/03010066241302996. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
The Development of Ambiguity Processing Is Explained by an Inverted U-Shaped Curve.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 16;14(9):826. doi: 10.3390/bs14090826.
6
Evidence of bottom-up homeostatic modulation induced taVNS during emotional and Go/No-Go tasks.
Exp Brain Res. 2024 Sep;242(9):2069-2081. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06876-x. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
7
The aggressive face of melasma: unveiling the influence of upper lip pigmentation on social perception.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2024 Apr;41(2):173-180. doi: 10.5114/ada.2024.138678. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
9
Affective evaluation of consciously perceived emotional faces reveals a "correct attribution effect".
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1146107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1146107. eCollection 2023.
10
Time distortions induced by high-arousing emotional compared to low-arousing neutral faces: an event-related potential study.
Psychol Res. 2023 Sep;87(6):1836-1847. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01789-2. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Discovering cultural differences (and similarities) in facial expressions of emotion.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Cultural differences in the neural correlates of social-emotional feelings: an interdisciplinary, developmental perspective.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Feelings and contexts: socioecological influences on the nonverbal expression of emotion.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
4
Revisiting diversity: cultural variation reveals the constructed nature of emotion perception.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
First Impressions From Faces.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;26(3):237-242. doi: 10.1177/0963721416683996. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
6
Are You Smiling, or Have I Seen You Before? Familiarity Makes Faces Look Happier.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Aug;28(8):1087-1102. doi: 10.1177/0956797617702003. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
Lisbon Emoji and Emoticon Database (LEED): Norms for emoji and emoticons in seven evaluative dimensions.
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):392-405. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0878-6.
8
Emotional faces influence evaluation of natural and transformed food.
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):675-683. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0857-7. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Emotion Perception from Face, Voice, and Touch: Comparisons and Convergence.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;21(3):216-228. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验