Agarwal Neha, Subramanian Arulselvi, Pandey Ravindra Mohan, Albert Venencia, Karjee Sulekha, Arya Vedanand
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India ; Department of Blood Bank, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2014 Dec;30(4):328-32. doi: 10.1007/s12288-013-0265-0. Epub 2013 May 15.
Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion is a crucial part of management of trauma patients. There is a paucity of literature about the audit of appropriateness of FFP use in trauma patients. To evaluate and analyze the appropriateness of FFP transfusion practices for trauma patients. Prospectively compiled blood bank records of FFP transfusion practices over a period of 4 months from Augusts'08 through Deember'08 were retrospectively analyzed for 207 patients. The number of FFP units used in all these trauma patients were evaluated a propos the cause of injury, departments, type of surgery, presence of coagulopathy, bleeding, massive transfusion, length of hospital stay and patient outcome. Trauma scores such as Glasgow coma score and injury severity score were also calculated to estimate the severity of injury. The appropriateness of FFP transfusion was assessed according to the guidelines drafted by the College of American Pathologists. FFP transfusion for patients experiencing active bleeding, micro vascular bleeding, coagulopathy and/or massive transfusion, was deemed appropriate. Patients receiving FFP were categorized and individually correlated with the outcome. The influences of other variables which affect patient outcome were excluded using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. p value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. A total of 207 trauma patients were included in the study, 183 (88.4 %) males and 24 (11.6 %) females. The FFP use among neurosurgery patients was 46.9 %, general surgery patients 40.6 % and orthopedics 12.6 %. Appropriate use of FFP was 49.5 % according to the CAP guidelines. Trauma patients who required FFP as a part of treatment were categorized as; Patients who had bleeding alone (n = 40), bleeding with coagulopathy (n = 16), and coagulopathy alone (n = 43), and further correlated with the outcome and were found statistically insignificant. The prevalence of appropriate use of FFP at trauma centre was 49.5 %. The FFP use by neurosurgery:orthopedics:general surgery was 5:1:4. The highest appropriate FFP use was by Neurosurgery department (50.5 %). Assessing the pattern of usage and rate of misuse of FFP units, allows us to establish required strategies to improve the state of affairs.
新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)输注是创伤患者治疗的关键部分。关于创伤患者FFP使用适宜性审计的文献较少。为评估和分析创伤患者FFP输注实践的适宜性。对2008年8月至12月期间前瞻性收集的4个月FFP输注实践血库记录进行回顾性分析,涉及207例患者。评估了所有这些创伤患者使用的FFP单位数量与损伤原因、科室、手术类型、凝血病的存在、出血、大量输血、住院时间和患者结局的关系。还计算了格拉斯哥昏迷评分和损伤严重程度评分等创伤评分,以估计损伤的严重程度。根据美国病理学家学会起草的指南评估FFP输注的适宜性。对于有活动性出血、微血管出血、凝血病和/或大量输血的患者,FFP输注被认为是适宜的。接受FFP的患者进行分类,并分别与结局相关联。使用逐步多因素逻辑回归分析排除影响患者结局的其他变量的影响。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。该研究共纳入207例创伤患者,其中男性183例(88.4%),女性24例(11.6%)。神经外科患者的FFP使用率为46.9%,普通外科患者为40.6%,骨科为12.6%。根据CAP指南,FFP的适宜使用率为49.5%。作为治疗一部分需要FFP的创伤患者分类如下:仅出血的患者(n = 40)、出血合并凝血病的患者(n = 16)和仅凝血病的患者(n = 43),并进一步与结局相关联,发现无统计学意义。创伤中心FFP的适宜使用率为49.5%。神经外科、骨科、普通外科的FFP使用比例为5:1:4。FFP适宜使用率最高的是神经外科(50.5%)。评估FFP单位的使用模式和误用率,使我们能够制定所需策略以改善现状。