Samson-Robert Olivier, Labrie Geneviève, Chagnon Madeleine, Fournier Valérie
Centre de recherche en horticulture, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
CÉROM, Centre de recherche sur les grains Inc., Saint-Mathieu-de-Beloeil, Québec, Canada.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e108443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108443. eCollection 2014.
In recent years, populations of honey bees and other pollinators have been reported to be in decline worldwide. A number of stressors have been identified as potential contributing factors, including the extensive prophylactic use of neonicotinoid insecticides, which are highly toxic to bees, in agriculture. While multiple routes of exposure to these systemic insecticides have been documented for honey bees, contamination from puddle water has not been investigated. In this study, we used a multi-residue method based on LC-MS/MS to analyze samples of puddle water taken in the field during the planting of treated corn and one month later. If honey bees were to collect and drink water from these puddles, our results showed that they would be exposed to various agricultural pesticides. All water samples collected from corn fields were contaminated with at least one neonicotinoid compound, although most contained more than one systemic insecticide. Concentrations of neonicotinoids were higher in early spring, indicating that emission and drifting of contaminated dust during sowing raises contamination levels of puddles. Although the overall average acute risk of drinking water from puddles was relatively low, concentrations of neonicotinoids ranged from 0.01 to 63 µg/L and were sufficient to potentially elicit a wide array of sublethal effects in individuals and colony alike. Our results also suggest that risk assessment of honey bee water resources underestimates the foragers' exposure and consequently miscalculates the risk. In fact, our data shows that honey bees and native pollinators are facing unprecedented cumulative exposure to these insecticides from combined residues in pollen, nectar and water. These findings not only document the impact of this route of exposure for honey bees, they also have implications for the cultivation of a wide variety of crops for which the extensive use of neonicotinoids is currently promoted.
近年来,据报道全球范围内蜜蜂和其他传粉者的数量正在减少。已确定多种压力源为潜在促成因素,包括农业中广泛预防性使用对蜜蜂剧毒的新烟碱类杀虫剂。虽然已记录了蜜蜂接触这些内吸性杀虫剂的多种途径,但尚未对水坑水污染情况进行调查。在本研究中,我们使用基于液相色谱 - 串联质谱的多残留方法,分析了在种植经处理玉米期间及一个月后在田间采集的水坑水样。如果蜜蜂采集并饮用这些水坑中的水,我们的结果表明它们将接触到各种农业杀虫剂。从玉米田采集的所有水样都至少被一种新烟碱类化合物污染,尽管大多数含有不止一种内吸性杀虫剂。新烟碱类化合物的浓度在早春较高,表明播种期间受污染粉尘的排放和漂移提高了水坑的污染水平。虽然从水坑饮用水的总体平均急性风险相对较低,但新烟碱类化合物的浓度范围为0.01至63微克/升,足以对个体和蜂群潜在引发一系列亚致死效应。我们的结果还表明,对蜜蜂水资源的风险评估低估了觅食者的接触情况,因此错误计算了风险。事实上,我们的数据表明,蜜蜂和本地传粉者正面临前所未有的这些杀虫剂的累积接触,这些杀虫剂来自花粉、花蜜和水中的混合残留物。这些发现不仅记录了这种接触途径对蜜蜂的影响,它们还对目前推广广泛使用新烟碱类化合物的多种作物的种植具有启示意义。