Suppr超能文献

用于开发生物制剂给药装置的药代动力学桥接方法:以戈利木单抗自动注射器为例

Pharmacokinetic bridging approach for developing biologics-delivery devices: a case study with a golimumab autoinjector.

作者信息

Xu Zhenhua, Marciniak Stanley J, Frederick Bart, Kim Lilianne, Zhuang Yanli, Davis Hugh M, Zhou Honghui

机构信息

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2015 Feb 1;37(2):427-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) comparability study in healthy subjects was performed to compare the PK properties and tolerability of single-dose golimumab 100 mg delivered subcutaneously by an autoinjector device or by a standard needle and syringe that had been used for the subcutaneous (SC) delivery of golimumab in pivotal Phase 3 studies.

METHODS

Healthy male subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single injection of SC golimumab 100 mg using either the autoinjector or a standard needle and syringe. The PK parameters of golimumab were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. An ANOVA model was applied to compare the 2 injection methods with regard to golimumab C(max) and the AUC from 0 and 49 days after administration (AUC(0-49d)).

FINDINGS

In the prespecified evaluable PK population (n = 141), the mean (SD) values for C(max) were 6.6 (3.3) and 6.0 (3.0) µg/mL, and AUC(0-49d) values were 97.4 (43.2) and 88.9 (36.8) µg·d/mL in the autoinjector and needle/syringe groups, respectively. The 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios of the AUC(0-49d) values between the 2 delivery methods was 95.17% to 120.55%; the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio of C(max) was 96.14% to 127.42%. In a post hoc intent-to-treat analysis using data from all 156 subjects, the 90% CIs of both C(max) and AUC(0-49d) fell within the prespecified range for bioequivalence (80% to 125%). The prevalences of adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

IMPLICATIONS

The totality of the study findings suggests that the PK properties and tolerability of SC administration of golimumab by the 2 delivery methods were comparable. The study results successfully bridged the container-closure change from a liquid-in-vial product to either a prefilled syringe or an autoinjector with the same liquid formulation.

摘要

目的

本项针对健康受试者的1期药代动力学(PK)可比性研究旨在比较自动注射器装置或标准针头和注射器皮下注射单剂量100mg戈利木单抗的PK特性和耐受性,其中标准针头和注射器曾在关键的3期研究中用于戈利木单抗的皮下(SC)给药。

方法

健康男性受试者被随机分配,使用自动注射器或标准针头和注射器接受单次皮下注射100mg戈利木单抗。采用非房室分析计算戈利木单抗的PK参数。应用方差分析模型比较两种注射方法在戈利木单抗C(max)以及给药后0至49天的AUC(AUC(0-49d))方面的差异。

结果

在预先指定的可评估PK人群(n = 141)中,自动注射器组和针头/注射器组的C(max)均值(标准差)分别为6.6(3.3)和6.0(3.0)μg/mL,AUC(0-49d)值分别为97.4(43.2)和88.9(36.8)μg·d/mL。两种给药方法之间AUC(0-49d)值的几何平均比值的90%CI为95.17%至120.55%;C(max)几何平均比值的90%CI为96.14%至127.42%。在一项使用所有156名受试者数据的事后意向性分析中,C(max)和AUC(0-49d)的90%CI均落在预先指定的生物等效性范围内(80%至125%)。两组不良事件的发生率相似。

结论

研究结果总体表明,两种给药方法皮下注射戈利木单抗的PK特性和耐受性具有可比性。研究结果成功地将容器密封从玻璃瓶液体产品转变为具有相同液体制剂的预填充注射器或自动注射器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验