Ramael Steven, Van Hoorick Benjamin, Tiessen Renger, van Iersel Thijs, Moschetti Viktoria, Lang Benjamin, Sonderegger Ivo, Wiebe Sabrina, Liedert Bernd, Jayadeva Girish
SGS Life Science Services, CPU, Antwerp, Belgium.
PRA Health Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):403-421. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0119-1. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
BI 695501 has shown similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to the adalimumab reference product, Humira. We present two phase 1 studies comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via autoinjector (AI) vs. prefilled syringe (PFS).
Both trials were randomized, open-label, parallel-group studies undertaken in subjects aged ≥ 18-65 years. VOLTAIRE-AI (NCT02606903) recruited healthy, Caucasian, male, non-athletic volunteers with BMI ≥ 18 to ≤ 30 kg/m. VOLTAIRE-TAI (NCT02899338) recruited healthy men and women with BMI > 17.5 to < 35 kg/m. In both studies, a single dose of BI 695501 40 mg was administered via AI or PFS to the abdomen (VOLTAIRE-AI) or thigh (VOLTAIRE-TAI). The observation period was 43/57 days and the safety follow-up was 70 days. Co-primary endpoints were AUC or AUC, C, and AUC. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed.
Subjects (VOLTAIRE-AI: N = 71; VOLTAIRE-TAI: N = 162) were randomized to AI (n = 35; n = 81) or PFS (n = 36; n = 81). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups in each study. Total exposure of BI 695501 was similar for both groups; adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC, AUC, and C were 106.17, 104.09, and 114.83%, respectively, for VOLTAIRE-AI; 103.19, 101.71 (AUC), and 100.11% for VOLTAIRE-TAI. In both studies, similar immunogenicity was observed between groups in terms of frequency of binding and neutralizing anti-drug antibody-positive subjects. Incidence of adverse events was similar for both groups.
Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via AI were similar to administration using a PFS, independent of injection site. No differences are expected between AI and PFS use in clinical practice.
Boehringer Ingelheim.
BI 695501已显示出与阿达木单抗参比产品修美乐具有相似的疗效、安全性和免疫原性。我们开展了两项1期研究,比较通过自动注射器(AI)与预填充注射器(PFS)给药的BI 695501的药代动力学、安全性和免疫原性。
两项试验均为随机、开放标签、平行组研究,纳入年龄≥18至65岁的受试者。VOLTAIRE - AI(NCT02606903)招募了健康、白种人、男性、非运动员志愿者,BMI≥18至≤30kg/m²。VOLTAIRE - TAI(NCT02899338)招募了BMI>17.5至<35kg/m²的健康男性和女性。在两项研究中,均通过AI或PFS向腹部(VOLTAIRE - AI)或大腿(VOLTAIRE - TAI)给予单剂量40mg的BI 695501。观察期为43/57天,安全性随访为70天。共同主要终点为AUC或AUC、Cmax和AUC。评估了安全性和免疫原性。
受试者(VOLTAIRE - AI:N = 71;VOLTAIRE - TAI:N = 162)被随机分配至AI组(n = 35;n = 81)或PFS组(n = 36;n = 81)。每项研究中各治疗组之间的基线特征均衡。两组BI 695501的总暴露量相似;VOLTAIRE - AI组AUC、AUC和Cmax的调整几何平均比值分别为106.17%、104.09%和114.83%;VOLTAIRE - TAI组分别为103.19%、101.71%(AUC)和100.11%。在两项研究中,结合和中和抗药物抗体阳性受试者的频率方面,两组观察到相似的免疫原性。两组不良事件的发生率相似。
通过AI给药的BI 695501的药代动力学和免疫原性与使用PFS给药相似,与注射部位无关。临床实践中使用AI和PFS预计不会有差异。
勃林格殷格翰公司。