Rao Vishal N, Sheridan Stacey L, Tuttle Laura A, Lin Feng-Chang, Shimbo Daichi, Diaz Keith M, Hinderliter Alan L, Viera Anthony J
MD-MPH Program, UNC School of Medicine and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Jan;17(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/jch.12443. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) readings predict the increased risks of cardiovascular events and end-organ damage independent of office blood pressure (BP). Numeracy (the ability to handle numbers) may limit the feasibility of patients' performing HBPM. The authors analyzed data from 409 adults recruited from 12 North Carolina primary care clinics who completed a three-item numeracy assessment, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form health literacy assessment, and HBPM over 2 weeks. Among the 409 participants, 73% were college graduates and 69% had adequate numeracy. Completion of HBPM was greater among those with adequate numeracy (96.2% vs 93.7%; P=.009) and did not correlate with health literacy scores. More participants with adequate numeracy reported completion of ≥85% of readings than those with low numeracy (95% vs 88%; P=.018). Adequate numeracy, but not high literacy, is associated with more complete HBPM reporting. Whether higher numeracy is associated with more accurate self-reported readings is an area of future research.
家庭血压监测(HBPM)读数可独立于诊室血压(BP)预测心血管事件和靶器官损害风险的增加。算术能力(处理数字的能力)可能会限制患者进行HBPM的可行性。作者分析了从北卡罗来纳州12家初级保健诊所招募的409名成年人的数据,这些成年人完成了一项包含三个项目的算术评估、医学成人识字率快速评估简表健康素养评估以及为期两周的HBPM。在409名参与者中,73%为大学毕业生,69%具备足够的算术能力。算术能力足够的参与者完成HBPM的比例更高(96.2%对93.7%;P = 0.009),且与健康素养得分无关。与算术能力低的参与者相比,更多算术能力足够的参与者报告完成了≥85%的读数(95%对88%;P = 0.018)。足够的算术能力而非高识字率与更完整的HBPM报告相关。更高的算术能力是否与更准确的自我报告读数相关是未来研究的一个领域。