Werner Marie D, Leondires Mark P, Schoolcraft William B, Miller Brad T, Copperman Alan B, Robins Edwin D, Arredondo Francisco, Hickman Timothy N, Gutmann Jacqueline, Schillings Wendy J, Levy Brynn, Taylor Deanne, Treff Nathan R, Scott Richard T
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School of Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Reproductive Medicine Associates of Connecticut, Norwalk, Connecticut.
Fertil Steril. 2014 Dec;102(6):1613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
To determine the clinically recognizable error rate with the use of quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS).
Retrospective study.
Multiple fertility centers.
PATIENT(S): All patients receiving euploid designated embryos.
INTERVENTION(S): Trophectoderm biopsy for CCS.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of the pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of qPCR-designated euploid embryos. Calculation of the clinically recognizable error rate.
RESULT(S): A total of 3,168 transfers led to 2,354 pregnancies (74.3%). Of 4,794 CCS euploid embryos transferred, 2,976 gestational sacs developed, reflecting a clinical implantation rate of 62.1%. In the cases where a miscarriage occurred and products of conception were available for analysis, ten were ultimately found to be aneuploid. Seven were identified in the products of conception following clinical losses and three in ongoing pregnancies. The clinically recognizable error rate per embryo designated as euploid was 0.21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.37). The clinically recognizable error rate per transfer was 0.32% (95% CI 0.16-0.56). The clinically recognizable error rate per ongoing pregnancy was 0.13% (95% CI 0.03-0.37). Three products of conception from aneuploid losses were available to the molecular laboratory for detailed examination, and all of them demonstrated fetal mosaicism.
CONCLUSION(S): The clinically recognizable error rate with qPCR-based CCS is real but quite low. Although evaluated in only a limited number of specimens, mosaicism appears to play a prominent role in misdiagnoses. Mosaic errors present a genuine limit to the effectiveness of aneuploidy screening, because they are not attributable to technical issues in the embryology or analytic laboratories.
确定使用基于定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)的全面染色体筛查(CCS)时临床上可识别的错误率。
回顾性研究。
多个生殖中心。
所有接受整倍体指定胚胎的患者。
对滋养外胚层进行活检以进行CCS。
评估qPCR指定的整倍体胚胎移植后的妊娠结局。计算临床上可识别的错误率。
总共3168次移植导致2354例妊娠(74.3%)。在移植的4794个CCS整倍体胚胎中,2976个妊娠囊发育,临床着床率为62.1%。在发生流产且有妊娠产物可供分析的病例中,最终发现10例为非整倍体。7例在临床流产后的妊娠产物中被鉴定出来,3例在持续妊娠中被鉴定出来。每个被指定为整倍体的胚胎的临床上可识别错误率为0.21%(95%置信区间[CI]0.10 - 0.37)。每次移植的临床上可识别错误率为0.32%(95%CI 0.16 - 0.56)。每个持续妊娠的临床上可识别错误率为0.13%(95%CI 0.03 - 0.37)。来自非整倍体流产的3个妊娠产物可供分子实验室进行详细检查,所有这些产物均显示胎儿嵌合体现象。
基于qPCR的CCS临床上可识别的错误率确实存在,但相当低。尽管仅在有限数量的标本中进行了评估,但嵌合体现象似乎在误诊中起重要作用。嵌合体错误对非整倍体筛查的有效性构成了真正的限制,因为它们并非归因于胚胎学或分析实验室的技术问题。