Bondre Ioana L, Holihan Julie L, Askenasy Erik P, Greenberg Jacob A, Keith Jerrod N, Martindale Robert G, Roth J Scott, Liang Mike K
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
J Surg Res. 2016 Feb;200(2):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Data are lacking to support the choice between suture, synthetic mesh, or biologic matrix in contaminated ventral hernia repair (VHR). We hypothesize that in contaminated VHR, suture repair is associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infection (SSI).
A multicenter database of all open VHR performed at from 2010-2011 was reviewed. All patients with follow-up of 1 mo and longer were included. The primary outcome was SSI as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The secondary outcome was hernia recurrence (assessed clinically or radiographically). Multivariate analysis (stepwise regression for SSI and Cox proportional hazard model for recurrence) was performed.
A total of 761 VHR were reviewed for a median (range) follow-up of 15 (1-50) mo: there were 291(38%) suture, 303 (40%) low-density and/or mid-density synthetic mesh, and 167(22%) biologic matrix repair. On univariate analysis, there were differences in the three groups including ethnicity, ASA, body mass index, institution, diabetes, primary versus incisional hernia, wound class, hernia size, prior VHR, fascial release, skin flaps, and acute repair. The unadjusted outcomes for SSI (15.1%; 17.8%; 21.0%; P = 0.280) and recurrence (17.8%; 13.5%; 21.5%; P = 0.074) were not statistically different between groups. On multivariate analysis, biologic matrix was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in both SSI and recurrences, whereas synthetic mesh associated with fewer recurrences compared to suture (hazard ratio = 0.60; P = 0.015) and nonsignificant increase in SSI.
Interval estimates favored biologic matrix repair in contaminated VHR; however, these results were not statistically significant. In the absence of higher level evidence, surgeons should carefully balance risk, cost, and benefits in managing contaminated ventral hernia repair.
在污染性腹疝修补术(VHR)中,缺乏数据支持在缝线、合成补片或生物基质之间做出选择。我们假设在污染性VHR中,缝线修补术与手术部位感染(SSI)发生率最低相关。
回顾了2010年至2011年期间所有开放性VHR的多中心数据库。纳入所有随访1个月及更长时间的患者。主要结局是疾病控制与预防中心定义的SSI。次要结局是疝复发(通过临床或影像学评估)。进行多变量分析(SSI采用逐步回归分析,复发采用Cox比例风险模型)。
共回顾了761例VHR,中位(范围)随访时间为15(1至50)个月:291例(38%)采用缝线修补,303例(40%)采用低密度和/或中密度合成补片修补,167例(22%)采用生物基质修补。单变量分析显示,三组在种族、美国麻醉医师协会分级、体重指数、机构、糖尿病、原发性与切口疝、伤口分级、疝大小、既往VHR、筋膜松解、皮瓣和急诊修补方面存在差异。三组间SSI(15.1%;17.8%;21.0%;P = 0.280)和复发(17.8%;13.5%;21.5%;P = 0.074)的未调整结局无统计学差异。多变量分析显示,生物基质与SSI和复发率的非显著性降低相关,而合成补片与缝线相比复发较少(风险比 = 0.60;P = 0.015),且SSI无显著性增加。
区间估计倾向于在污染性VHR中采用生物基质修补;然而,这些结果无统计学意义。在缺乏更高级别证据的情况下,外科医生在处理污染性腹疝修补时应仔细权衡风险、成本和获益。