Lang Catherine E, Bland Marghuretta D, Cheng Nuo, Corbetta Maurizio, Lee Jin-Moo
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Program in Physical Therapy, Program in Occupational Therapy; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;23(10):2914-2919. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.07.049. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
We examined the benefit of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), delivered as part of usual stroke management, on patient-reported outcomes and health care utilization. Using a case control design, patients who received tPA as part of usual stroke management were compared with patients who would have received tPA had they arrived to the hospital within the therapeutic time window. Data were collected from surveys 6 months after stroke using standardized patient-reported outcome measures and questions about health care utilization. Demographic and medical data were acquired from hospital records. Patients were matched on stroke severity, age, race, and gender. Matching was done with 1:2 ratio of tPA to controls. Results were compared between groups with 1-tailed tests because of a directionally specific hypothesis in favor of the tPA group. The tPA (n = 78) and control (n = 156) groups were matched across variables, except for stroke severity, which was better in the control group; subsequent analyses controlled for this mismatch. The tPA group reported better physical function, communication, cognitive ability, depressive symptomatology, and quality of life/participation compared with the control group. Fewer people in the tPA group reported skilled nursing facility stays, emergency department visits, and rehospitalizations after their stroke compared with controls. Reports of other postacute services were not different between groups. Although it is known that tPA reduces disability, this is the first study to demonstrate the effectiveness of tPA in improving meaningful, patient-reported outcomes. Thus, use of tPA provides a large benefit to the daily lives of people with ischemic stroke.
我们研究了作为常规中风治疗一部分的组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)对患者报告的结局以及医疗保健利用情况的益处。采用病例对照设计,将作为常规中风治疗一部分接受tPA治疗的患者与如果在治疗时间窗内到达医院就会接受tPA治疗的患者进行比较。在中风6个月后,使用标准化的患者报告结局测量方法以及关于医疗保健利用情况的问题进行调查收集数据。从医院记录中获取人口统计学和医疗数据。根据中风严重程度、年龄、种族和性别对患者进行匹配。tPA组与对照组的匹配比例为1:2。由于存在支持tPA组的方向性特定假设,因此采用单尾检验对两组结果进行比较。tPA组(n = 78)和对照组(n = 156)在各变量上进行了匹配,但中风严重程度除外,对照组的中风严重程度更好;后续分析对这种不匹配情况进行了控制。与对照组相比,tPA组在身体功能、沟通能力、认知能力、抑郁症状以及生活质量/参与度方面报告的情况更好。与对照组相比,tPA组中风后报告入住专业护理机构、前往急诊科就诊以及再次住院的人数更少。两组之间关于其他急性后期服务的报告没有差异。虽然已知tPA可减少残疾,但这是第一项证明tPA在改善有意义的、患者报告的结局方面有效性的研究。因此,使用tPA对缺血性中风患者的日常生活有很大益处。