Mayne Ian P, Wasserstein David, Modi Chetan S, Henry Patrick D G, Mahomed Nizar, Veillette Christian
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jan;24(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Simple elbow dislocations are often treated with closed reduction (CR); however, the rate of CR failure and factors that may predict failure have been largely underinvestigated. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the incidence of elbow dislocations treated by CR in a universal health care system and (2) to identify patient characteristics associated with failed CR, defined as the subsequent need for open reduction.
Patients ≥16 years old who underwent elbow CR by a physician between 1994 and 2010 were identified from administrative databases. Concurrent elbow fractures were excluded. The incidence density rate (IDR) of CR per 100,000 eligible person-years among the general population was calculated. Failed CR was defined as subsequent open reduction with or without ligament repair or reconstruction within 90 days. Patient and provider characteristics were modeled in a multivariate logistic regression for failure.
The cohort consisted of 4878 patients (median age, 41 years) who underwent CR (IDR, 2.65 per 100,000 person-years), and 75 (1.5%) underwent subsequent open reduction with or without ligament repair or reconstruction (median time, 15 days). Young men (≤20 years) had the highest IDR (7.45 per 100,000 person-years), twice that of young women (P = .005). Patient characteristics associated with failed CR included older age (P = .001), admission to the hospital (P < .0001), >1 attempted CR (P = .001), and new orthopedic consultation in the 4 weeks after the CR (P = .02).
Young men are at highest risk for CR for simple elbow dislocations; however, older patients are more likely to require open intervention, as are those with markers of a difficult reduction signifying potentially greater soft tissue damage. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of simple elbow dislocation will aid management decisions.
单纯性肘关节脱位通常采用闭合复位(CR)治疗;然而,CR失败率以及可能预测失败的因素在很大程度上尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是:(1)确定在全民医疗保健系统中接受CR治疗的肘关节脱位的发生率;(2)识别与CR失败相关的患者特征,CR失败定义为随后需要进行切开复位。
从管理数据库中识别出1994年至2010年间由医生进行肘关节CR的16岁及以上患者。排除并发的肘关节骨折。计算普通人群中每100,000符合条件的人年的CR发病率密度率(IDR)。CR失败定义为在90天内随后进行切开复位,无论是否进行韧带修复或重建。在多因素逻辑回归模型中对患者和医疗服务提供者的特征进行失败分析。
该队列包括4878例接受CR的患者(中位年龄41岁)(IDR为每100,000人年2.65例),其中75例(1.5%)随后进行了切开复位,无论是否进行韧带修复或重建(中位时间为15天)。年轻男性(≤20岁)的IDR最高(每100,000人年7.45例),是年轻女性的两倍(P = 0.005)。与CR失败相关的患者特征包括年龄较大(P = 0.001)、入院治疗(P < 0.0001)、尝试CR超过1次(P = 0.001)以及在CR后4周内进行新的骨科会诊(P = 0.02)。
年轻男性发生单纯性肘关节脱位CR失败的风险最高;然而,老年患者更有可能需要切开干预,那些复位困难标志着可能存在更大软组织损伤的患者也是如此。对单纯性肘关节脱位流行病学的全面了解将有助于管理决策。