Suppr超能文献

单纯性肘关节脱位后二次手术的频率及危险因素。

The frequency and risk factors for subsequent surgery after a simple elbow dislocation.

作者信息

Modi Chetan S, Wasserstein David, Mayne Ian P, Henry Patrick D G, Mahomed Nizar, Veillette Christian J H

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Sports Medicine Program, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto Sports Medicine Program, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Injury. 2015;46(6):1156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Simple elbow dislocations treated by closed reduction are thought to result in a satisfactory return of function in most patients. Little, however, is known about how many patients ultimately proceed to subsequent surgical treatment due to the low patient numbers and significant loss to follow-up in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to establish the rate of and risk factors for subsequent surgical treatment after closed reduction of a simple elbow dislocation at a population level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients aged 16 years or older who underwent closed reduction of a simple elbow dislocation between 1994 and 2010 were identified using a population database. Subsequent procedures performed for joint contractures, instability or arthritis were recorded. Outcomes were modelled as a function of age, sex, income quintile, co-morbidity, urban/rural status, physician speciality performing the initial reduction and whether orthopaedic consultation and/or post-reduction radiograph was performed within 28 days of the injury, in a time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 4878 elbow dislocations with a minimum 2-year follow-up: stabilisation surgery was performed in 112 (2.3%) at a median time of 1 month, contracture release in 59 (1.2%) at median 9 months and arthroplasty in seven (0.1%) at median 25 months. Admission to hospital for the initial reduction was associated with an increased risk of undergoing stabilisation (hazard ratio (HR), 2.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.67-3.74) and contracture release (HR, 1.93; CI, 1.08-3.44). Multiple reduction attempts increased the risk of requiring contracture release (HR, 3.71; CI, 1.22-11.29). Survival analysis demonstrated that all subsequent procedures had taken place by 4-5 years.

CONCLUSION

Few patients with simple elbow dislocations develop complications requiring surgery, but those that do most commonly undergo soft-tissue stabilisation or contracture release within 4 years of the injury. Contrary to current thinking, surgery for instability is performed more often than joint contracture release, albeit with slightly different time patterns.

摘要

引言

通过闭合复位治疗的单纯性肘关节脱位被认为在大多数患者中能带来令人满意的功能恢复。然而,由于目前文献中患者数量较少且随访失访严重,对于有多少患者最终会接受后续手术治疗知之甚少。本研究的目的是在人群层面确定单纯性肘关节脱位闭合复位后后续手术治疗的发生率及危险因素。

患者与方法

利用人群数据库识别出1994年至2010年间所有年龄在16岁及以上且接受了单纯性肘关节脱位闭合复位的患者。记录因关节挛缩、不稳定或关节炎而进行的后续手术。在生存分析中,将结局建模为年龄、性别、收入五分位数、合并症、城乡状况、进行初次复位的医生专业以及受伤后28天内是否进行了骨科会诊和/或复位后X光检查的函数。

结果

我们识别出4878例肘关节脱位且至少随访2年:112例(2.3%)在中位时间1个月时进行了稳定手术,59例(1.2%)在中位时间9个月时进行了挛缩松解,7例(0.1%)在中位时间25个月时进行了关节成形术。因初次复位而住院与接受稳定手术(风险比(HR),2.50;95%置信区间(CI),1.67 - 3.74)和挛缩松解(HR,1.93;CI,1.08 - 3.44)的风险增加相关。多次复位尝试增加了需要进行挛缩松解的风险(HR,3.71;CI,1.22 - 11.29)。生存分析表明,所有后续手术均在4至5年内进行。

结论

很少有单纯性肘关节脱位患者出现需要手术的并发症,但那些出现并发症的患者最常在受伤后4年内接受软组织稳定或挛缩松解手术。与目前的观点相反,尽管时间模式略有不同,但针对不稳定进行的手术比关节挛缩松解手术更常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验