Vanholder Raymond, Boelaert Jente, Glorieux Griet, Eloot Sunny
Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Semin Dial. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):114-24. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12331. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
This publication reviews the currently available methods to identify uremic retention solutes, to determine their biological relevance and to quantify their removal. The analytical methods for the detection of uremic solutes have improved continuously, allowing the identification of several previously unknown solutes. Progress has been accelerated by the development of comprehensive strategies such as genomics, proteomics and the latest "omics" area, metabolomics. Those methodologies will be further refined in future. Once the concentration of solutes of interest is known based on targeted analysis, their biological relevance can be studied by means of in vitro, ex vivo, or animal models, provided those are representative for the key complications of the uremic syndrome. For this to come to pass, rigid protocols should be applied, e.g., aiming at free solute concentrations conform those found in uremia. Subsequently, the decrease in concentration of relevant solutes should be pursued by nondialysis (e.g., by influencing nutritional intake or intestinal generation, using sorbents, modifying metabolism, or preserving renal function) and dialysis methods. Optimal dialysis strategies can be sought by studying solute kinetics during dialysis. Clinical studies are necessary to assess the correct impact of those optimized strategies on outcomes. Although longitudinal studies of solute concentration and surrogate outcome studies are first steps in suggesting the usefulness of a given approach, ultimately hard outcome randomized controlled trials are needed to endorse evidence-based therapeutic choices. The nonspecificity of dialysis removal is however a handicap limiting the chances to provide proof of concept that a given solute or group of solutes has definite biological impact.
本出版物综述了目前用于识别尿毒症潴留溶质、确定其生物学相关性以及量化其清除情况的可用方法。检测尿毒症溶质的分析方法不断改进,使得几种先前未知的溶质得以识别。基因组学、蛋白质组学以及最新的“组学”领域代谢组学等综合策略的发展加速了这一进程。这些方法在未来将得到进一步完善。一旦通过靶向分析确定了目标溶质的浓度,就可以借助体外、离体或动物模型来研究其生物学相关性,前提是这些模型能够代表尿毒症综合征的关键并发症。为此,应采用严格的方案,例如,使游离溶质浓度符合尿毒症患者体内的浓度。随后,应通过非透析方法(例如,通过影响营养摄入或肠道生成、使用吸附剂、改变代谢或保护肾功能)和透析方法来降低相关溶质的浓度。通过研究透析过程中的溶质动力学,可以寻求最佳透析策略。需要进行临床研究以评估这些优化策略对治疗结果的正确影响。尽管对溶质浓度的纵向研究和替代结局研究是表明特定方法有效性的第一步,但最终需要进行硬结局随机对照试验来支持基于证据的治疗选择。然而,透析清除的非特异性是一个障碍,限制了证明特定溶质或一组溶质具有明确生物学影响的可能性。