Parikh Janak Atul, Beane Joal D, Kilbane E Molly, Milgrom Daniel P, Pitt Henry A
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Dec;219(6):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
In the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), pancreatic fistula has not been monitored, although organ space infection (OSI) data are collected. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to determine the relationship between ACS NSQIP organ space infection and pancreatic fistulas.
From 2007 to 2011, 976 pancreatic resection patients were monitored via ACS NSQIP at our institution. From this database, 250 patients were randomly chosen for further analysis. Four patients were excluded because they underwent total pancreatectomy. Data on OSI were gathered prospectively. Data on pancreatic fistulas and other intra-abdominal complications were determined retrospectively.
Organ space infections (OSIs) were documented in 22 patients (8.9%). Grades B (n = 26) and C (n = 5) pancreatic fistulas occurred in 31 patients (12.4%); grade A fistulas were observed in 38 patients (15.2%). Bile leaks and gastrointestinal (GI) anastomotic leaks each developed in 5 (2.0%) patients. Only 17 of 31 grade B and C pancreatic fistulas (55%), and none of 38 grade A fistulas were classified as OSIs in ACS NSQIP. In addition, only 2 of 5 bile leaks (40%) and 2 of 5 GI anastomotic leaks (40%) were OSIs. Moreover, 3 OSIs were due to bacterial peritonitis, a chyle leak, and an ischemic bowel.
This analysis suggests that the sensitivity (55%) and specificity (45%) of organ space infection (OSI) in ACS NSQIP are too low for OSI to be a surrogate for grade B and C pancreatic fistulas. We concluded that procedure-specific variables will be required for ACS NSQIP to improve outcomes after pancreatectomy.
在美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)中,虽然收集了器官腔隙感染(OSI)数据,但未对胰瘘进行监测。因此,本分析的目的是确定ACS NSQIP器官腔隙感染与胰瘘之间的关系。
2007年至2011年,我们机构通过ACS NSQIP对976例胰腺切除术患者进行了监测。从该数据库中,随机选择250例患者进行进一步分析。4例接受全胰切除术的患者被排除。前瞻性收集OSI数据。胰瘘和其他腹腔内并发症的数据通过回顾性确定。
22例患者(8.9%)记录有器官腔隙感染(OSI)。31例患者(12.4%)发生B级(n = 26)和C级(n = 5)胰瘘;38例患者(15.2%)观察到A级胰瘘。5例(2.0%)患者分别发生胆漏和胃肠道(GI)吻合口漏。在ACS NSQIP中,31例B级和C级胰瘘中只有17例(55%)被归类为OSI,38例A级胰瘘均未被归类为OSI。此外,5例胆漏中只有2例(40%)和5例GI吻合口漏中只有2例(40%)是OSI。此外,3例OSI分别由细菌性腹膜炎、乳糜漏和缺血性肠病引起。
本分析表明,ACS NSQIP中器官腔隙感染(OSI)的敏感性(55%)和特异性(45%)过低,以至于OSI不能作为B级和C级胰瘘的替代指标。我们得出结论,ACS NSQIP需要特定于手术的变量来改善胰腺切除术后的结局。