Perkins Jessica M, Subramanian S V, Christakis Nicholas A
Department of Health Policy, Harvard University, 14 Story St., 4th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Kresge Building 7th Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jan;125:60-78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), naturally occurring social networks may be particularly vital to health outcomes as extended webs of social ties often are the principal source of various resources. Understanding how social network structure, and influential individuals within the network, may amplify the effects of interventions in LMICs, by creating, for example, cascade effects to non-targeted participants, presents an opportunity to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public health interventions in such settings. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Econlit, Sociological Abstracts, and PsycINFO to identify a sample of 17 sociocentric network papers (arising from 10 studies) that specifically examined health issues in LMICs. We also separately selected to review 19 sociocentric network papers (arising from 10 other studies) on development topics related to wellbeing in LMICs. First, to provide a methodological resource, we discuss the sociocentric network study designs employed in the selected papers, and then provide a catalog of 105 name generator questions used to measure social ties across all the LMIC network papers (including both ego- and sociocentric network papers) cited in this review. Second, we show that network composition, individual network centrality, and network structure are associated with important health behaviors and health and development outcomes in different contexts across multiple levels of analysis and across distinct network types. Lastly, we highlight the opportunities for health researchers and practitioners in LMICs to 1) design effective studies and interventions in LMICs that account for the sociocentric network positions of certain individuals and overall network structure, 2) measure the spread of outcomes or intervention externalities, and 3) enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of aid based on knowledge of social structure. In summary, human health and wellbeing are connected through complex webs of dynamic social relationships. Harnessing such information may be especially important in contexts where resources are limited and people depend on their direct and indirect connections for support.
在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),自然形成的社会网络对健康结果可能尤为重要,因为广泛的社会关系网络往往是各种资源的主要来源。了解社会网络结构以及网络中的有影响力个体如何通过例如对非目标参与者产生级联效应来放大低收入和中等收入国家干预措施的效果,为提高此类环境中公共卫生干预措施的效率和效果提供了契机。我们对PubMed、Econlit、Sociological Abstracts和PsycINFO进行了系统综述,以确定17篇社会中心网络论文(来自10项研究)的样本,这些论文专门研究了低收入和中等收入国家的健康问题。我们还另外挑选了19篇关于低收入和中等收入国家与福祉相关发展主题的社会中心网络论文(来自其他10项研究)进行综述。首先,为提供一种方法资源,我们讨论所选论文中采用的社会中心网络研究设计,然后提供一份105个名称生成器问题的目录,这些问题用于衡量本综述中引用的所有低收入和中等收入国家网络论文(包括自我中心和社会中心网络论文)中的社会关系。其次,我们表明,在多个分析层面和不同网络类型的不同背景下,网络构成、个体网络中心性和网络结构与重要的健康行为以及健康和发展结果相关。最后,我们强调低收入和中等收入国家的健康研究人员和从业者有机会:1)在低收入和中等收入国家设计有效的研究和干预措施,考虑某些个体的社会中心网络位置和整体网络结构;2)衡量结果或干预外部性的传播;3)基于社会结构知识提高援助的有效性和效率。总之,人类健康和福祉通过复杂的动态社会关系网络相互关联。在资源有限且人们依赖其直接和间接联系来获得支持的背景下,利用此类信息可能尤为重要。