Suppr超能文献

跨适应证的 Humana 商业数据库中的生物治疗药物的治疗模式和年度药物费用。

Treatment patterns and annual drug costs of biologic therapies across indications from the Humana commercial database.

机构信息

One Technology Place, Rockland, MA 02370.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Dec;20(12):1236-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.12.1236.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A variety of biologic therapies are currently used for the treatment of inflammatory autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). These diseases require long-term treatment, and information regarding the use and costs of biologic therapies can be valuable in making treatment and formulary decisions for clinicians and payers.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current utilization and annual costs of biologic therapies for treatment of RA, PsO, PsA, and AS in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort analysis utilized data from the Humana commercial claims database. Eligible patients had an index (first) claim between February 1, 2008, and September 30, 2011, for abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, or ustekinumab and a diagnosis of RA, PsO, PsA, AS, or combination of these diseases. Patients with and without a claim for their index therapy within 180 days prior to their index dates were defined as continuing and new patients, respectively. Outcomes included 1-year rates of persistence; rates of restarting, discontinuing, or switching for patients who were not persistent; and annual costs. Costs were based on dose and the October 2013 wholesale acquisition cost (WAC). Total expenditure was calculated as the (total index biologic drug utilization × WAC) + (number of administrations × Medicare fee schedule) + Σ(biologic dose after discontinuation × associated WAC price).

RESULTS

Of 2,721 patients analyzed, 1,308 (48%) were new patients, and 1,413 (52%) were continuing patients. Across approved indications, the most commonly used biologics were adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. Continuing patients had higher rates of persistence on index therapy than new patients. The mean annual cost [SD] per treated patient for new patients across all indications was numerically lowest for adalimumab ($20,916 [$7,572]), followed by infliximab ($22,516 [$8,460]) and etanercept ($23,567 [$8,314]). The mean annual cost [SD] per treated patient for continuing patients across all indications was numerically lowest for etanercept ($21,508 [$6,769]), followed by infliximab ($22,852 [$11,674]) and adalimumab ($24,341 [$8,906]).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor necrosis factor blockers adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab were the most commonly used biologics across indications. New patients were less persistent than those continuing on therapy. Among new patients, adalimumab had the lowest mean annual cost per treated patient, and etanercept had the lowest mean annual cost per treated patient among those continuing on therapy.

摘要

背景

目前有多种生物制剂用于治疗炎症性自身免疫性疾病,包括类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病(PsO)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)。这些疾病需要长期治疗,了解生物制剂的使用情况和成本对于临床医生和支付方制定治疗和处方决策非常有价值。

目的

评估在真实环境中生物制剂治疗 RA、PsO、PsA 和 AS 的当前使用情况和年度成本。

方法

这项回顾性观察性队列分析利用了 Humana 商业索赔数据库的数据。合格的患者在 2008 年 2 月 1 日至 2011 年 9 月 30 日之间有一个(首次)索引(第一个)索赔,用于阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、依那西普、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗或乌司奴单抗,并且诊断为 RA、PsO、PsA、AS 或这些疾病的组合。在索引日期之前的 180 天内,有或没有索引治疗索赔的患者分别被定义为持续治疗和新患者。结果包括:1 年的持续率;对于非持续患者,重新开始、停止或转换的比率;以及年度成本。成本基于剂量和 2013 年 10 月的批发采购成本(WAC)。总支出的计算方法是(总索引生物药物利用率×WAC)+(管理局)+Σ(停药后的生物剂量×相关 WAC 价格)。

结果

在分析的 2721 名患者中,1308 名(48%)为新患者,1413 名(52%)为持续治疗患者。在所有批准的适应证中,最常用的生物制剂是阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗。与新患者相比,持续治疗的患者索引治疗的持续率更高。所有适应证中,新患者的平均每位治疗患者的年度治疗费用(标准差)阿达木单抗最低(20916 美元[7572 美元]),其次是英夫利昔单抗(22516 美元[8460 美元])和依那西普(23567 美元[8314 美元])。所有适应证中,持续治疗患者的平均每位治疗患者的年度治疗费用(标准差)依那西普最低(21508 美元[6769 美元]),其次是英夫利昔单抗(22852 美元[11674 美元])和阿达木单抗(24341 美元[8906 美元])。

结论

肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗是所有适应证中最常用的生物制剂。新患者的持续治疗率低于继续治疗的患者。在新患者中,阿达木单抗的每位治疗患者的平均年度成本最低,而在继续治疗的患者中,依那西普的每位治疗患者的平均年度成本最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验