• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient characteristics associated with use of TNF vs interleukin inhibitors as first-line biologic treatment for psoriatic arthritis.与使用 TNF 与白细胞介素抑制剂作为银屑病关节炎一线生物治疗相关的患者特征。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1106-1117. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1106.
2
Treatment patterns and health care costs among patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.生物制剂或靶向合成疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗银屑病关节炎患者的治疗模式和医疗保健费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Feb;28(2):206-217. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.206.
3
Sustained long-term benefits of patient support program participation in immune-mediated diseases: improved medication-taking behavior and lower risk of a hospital visit.患者支持计划参与对免疫介导性疾病的长期持续获益:改善用药行为,降低住院风险。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20560. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Long-term Persistence of First-line Biologics for Patients With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the French Health Insurance Database.法国医保数据库中银屑病和银屑病关节炎患者一线生物制剂的长期持久性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):513-522. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0364.
5
Patient Support Program Increased Medication Adherence with Lower Total Health Care Costs Despite Increased Drug Spending.患者支持计划提高了药物依从性,降低了总体医疗保健成本,尽管药物支出增加了。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):770-779. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with a Biologic in the United States: Descriptive Analyses from an Administrative Claims Database.美国接受生物制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的治疗模式:来自行政索赔数据库的描述性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):623-631. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.623.
7
Real-world treatment patterns and use of adjunctive pain and anti-inflammatory medications among patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with IL-17A inhibitors in the United States.在美国,接受白细胞介素-17A 抑制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的真实世界治疗模式和辅助止痛及抗炎药物的使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):24-35. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22144. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
8
Long-term persistence of second-line biologics in psoriatic arthritis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure: a nationwide cohort study from the French health insurance database (SNDS).曾接受 TNF 抑制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者二线生物制剂的长期持续应用:来自法国健康保险数据库(SNDS)的全国性队列研究。
RMD Open. 2022 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002681.
9
Treatment Switch Patterns and Healthcare Costs in Biologic-Naive Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.生物制剂初治银屑病关节炎患者的治疗转换模式和医疗保健费用。
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2098-2115. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01262-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
Temporal Trends in Use of Biologic DMARDs for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States: A Cohort Study of Publicly and Privately Insured Patients.美国类风湿关节炎生物 DMARD 治疗的时间趋势:一项基于公共和私人保险患者的队列研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):809-814. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.8.809.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-world treatment patterns and use of adjunctive pain and anti-inflammatory medications among patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with IL-17A inhibitors in the United States.在美国,接受白细胞介素-17A 抑制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的真实世界治疗模式和辅助止痛及抗炎药物的使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jan;29(1):24-35. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22144. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment persistence of biologics among patients with psoriatic arthritis.银屑病关节炎患者生物制剂的治疗持续性
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Jan 29;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02417-x.
2
Persistence of biologic treatments in psoriatic arthritis: a population-based study in Sweden.银屑病关节炎生物治疗的持续性:瑞典一项基于人群的研究。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020 Dec 19;4(2):rkaa070. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa070. eCollection 2020.
3
Comparison of a new 3-item self-reported measure of adherence to medication with pharmacy claims data in patients with cardiometabolic disease.比较一种新的 3 项自我报告药物依从性测量方法与患有心脏代谢疾病患者的药房数据。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
4
EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update.EULAR 推荐的药物治疗银屑病关节炎管理:2019 年更新。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):700-712. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
5
Retention rates and identification of factors associated with anti-TNFα, anti-IL17, and anti-IL12/23R agents discontinuation in psoriatic arthritis patients: results from a real-world clinical setting.银屑病关节炎患者中抗TNFα、抗IL17及抗IL12/23R药物停药的留存率及相关因素识别:来自真实临床环境的结果
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2663-2670. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05027-1. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Treatment guidelines in psoriatic arthritis.银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Mar 1;59(Suppl 1):i37-i46. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez383.
7
Validation of claims-based algorithms for psoriatic arthritis.基于申报的银屑病关节炎算法验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;29(4):404-408. doi: 10.1002/pds.4950. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
Persistence and adherence of biologics in US patients with psoriatic arthritis: analyses from a claims database.美国银屑病关节炎患者使用生物制剂的持续性和依从性:来自索赔数据库的分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jun;8(8):607-621. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0023. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
9
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):5-32. doi: 10.1002/art.40726. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
10
Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with a Biologic in the United States: Descriptive Analyses from an Administrative Claims Database.美国接受生物制剂治疗的银屑病关节炎患者的治疗模式:来自行政索赔数据库的描述性分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):623-631. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.623.

与使用 TNF 与白细胞介素抑制剂作为银屑病关节炎一线生物治疗相关的患者特征。

Patient characteristics associated with use of TNF vs interleukin inhibitors as first-line biologic treatment for psoriatic arthritis.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics and Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1106-1117. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1106.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1106
PMID:34337987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391262/
Abstract

Previous studies have examined treatment patterns among patients who use tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, little data exist for a comparison between the TNF inhibitor treatment pattern and that of newly available biologics such as interleukin (IL)-12/23 or 17 inhibitors in the United States. To (a) examine patient characteristics and their association with initiation of TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors among PsA patients and (2) compare treatment persistence of PsA patients who initiated TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors as first-line biologic treatment in a real-world setting in the United States. : Using claims data from MarketScan (2013-2017), we identified a cohort of PsA patients who initiated TNF inhibitors or IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors. The primary outcome was treatment persistence, defined as continuous use of the index drug at 1 year, regardless of refill gaps. The secondary outcome was treatment persistence with high adherence at 1 year (ie, refill gaps ≤ 30 days). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between patient characteristics and treatment initiation and persistent use of TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors. We identified 3,180 TNF inhibitor initiators and 214 IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor initiators. Initiators of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors had more comorbidities than TNF inhibitor initiators. The proportion of patients with treatment persistence was 53.0% in TNF inhibitor initiators and 53.7% in IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor initiators; 37.1% of TNF inhibitor users and 24.8% of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitor users were treatment persistent with high adherence. There was no difference in 1-year treatment persistence between the 2 groups after adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for TNF inhibitors vs IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors: 0.86, 95% CI = 0.63-1.15). However, use of TNF inhibitors was associated with a greater treatment persistence with high adherence compared with use of IL-12/23 or 17 inhibitors (aOR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.15-2.26). PsA patients who initiated an IL 12/23 or 17 inhibitor had a greater comorbidity burden compared with those who initiated TNF inhibitors. Treatment persistence was similar between the 2 groups, whereas medication adherence was higher with TNF inhibitors than with IL 12/23 or 17 inhibitors during the first year of treatment. This study was funded by an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer, Inc (grant number: WI235988). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors. The sponsor was given the opportunity to make nonbinding comments on a draft of the manuscript. Publication of the manuscript was not contingent on approval by the sponsor. Kim has received research grants to the Brigham and Women's Hospital from Roche, AbbVie, and Bristol-Myers Squibb for unrelated topics. Merola is a consultant and/or investigator for BMS, AbbVie, Dermavant, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, UCB, Sun Pharma, and Pfizer. Jin, Chen, Lee, and Landon have nothing to disclose.

摘要

先前的研究已经考察了使用肿瘤坏死因子 (TNF) 抑制剂治疗银屑病关节炎 (PsA) 患者的治疗模式。然而,在美国,关于 TNF 抑制剂治疗模式与新出现的生物制剂(如白细胞介素 [IL]-12/23 或 17 抑制剂)之间的比较数据很少。(a)检查患者特征及其与 TNF 抑制剂与 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂起始之间的关联在 PsA 患者中,以及(2)比较在美国真实环境中作为一线生物治疗药物首次启动 TNF 抑制剂与 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂的 PsA 患者的治疗持续时间。使用 MarketScan(2013-2017 年)的索赔数据,我们确定了一个开始接受 TNF 抑制剂或 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂的 PsA 患者队列。主要结局是治疗持续性,定义为无论再填充间隔如何,索引药物在 1 年内的连续使用。次要结局是治疗持续性和 1 年内高依从性(即再填充间隔≤30 天)。多变量逻辑回归用于评估患者特征与治疗起始和持续使用 TNF 抑制剂与 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂之间的关联。我们确定了 3180 名 TNF 抑制剂起始者和 214 名 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂起始者。IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂的起始者比 TNF 抑制剂的起始者有更多的合并症。TNF 抑制剂起始者的治疗持续率为 53.0%,IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂起始者为 53.7%;37.1%的 TNF 抑制剂使用者和 24.8%的 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂使用者具有高依从性的治疗持续性。调整基线特征后,两组之间 1 年治疗持续性无差异(TNF 抑制剂与 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂的调整比值比 [aOR]:0.86,95%CI=0.63-1.15)。然而,与使用 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂相比,使用 TNF 抑制剂与更高的治疗持续性相关(aOR=1.61,95%CI=1.15-2.26)。与开始使用 TNF 抑制剂的患者相比,开始使用 IL 12/23 或 17 抑制剂的患者的合并症负担更大。两组之间的治疗持续性相似,而在治疗的第一年,与 IL-12/23 或 17 抑制剂相比,TNF 抑制剂的药物依从性更高。这项研究得到了辉瑞公司(Pfizer,Inc.)的一项由研究者发起的研究资助(赠款编号:WI235988)。内容仅由作者负责。赞助商有机会对手稿的草案提出非约束性意见。出版该手稿不受赞助商批准的限制。Kim 博士已从罗氏、艾伯维(AbbVie)和百时美施贵宝(Bristol-Myers Squibb)获得与无关主题的研究赠款。Merola 是 BMS、艾伯维、Dermavant、礼来、诺华、杨森、UCB、太阳制药和辉瑞的顾问和/或研究员。Jin、Chen、Lee 和 Landon 没有什么可透露的。