Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎、银屑病、银屑病关节炎或强直性脊柱炎患者每例生物反应调节剂的年度获得和管理成本。

Annual acquisition and administration cost of biologic response modifiers per patient with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.

机构信息

Truven Health Analytics, Cambridge, MA 01810, USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2013 Sep;16(9):1120-8. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.820192. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate annual biologic response modifier (BRM) cost per treated patient with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and/or ankylosing spondylitis receiving etanercept, abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, or ustekinumab.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of 69,349 commercially insured individuals in a nationwide claims database with one of these conditions that had a claim for one of these BRMs between January 2008 and December 2010 (the index BRM/index date). Cost per treated patient was calculated as the total BRM acquisition and administration cost to the payer in the first year after the index date (including costs of other BRMs after switching) divided by the number of patients who received the index BRM. Etanercept was selected as the reference for comparisons.

RESULTS

Etanercept was the most commonly used index BRM (n = 32,298; 47%), followed by adalimumab (n = 20,582; 30%), infliximab (n = 11,157; 16%), abatacept (n = 2633; 4%), rituximab (n = 1359; 2%), golimumab (n = 687; <1%), ustekinumab (n = 388; <1%), and certolizumab (n = 245; <1%). Using etanercept as the reference, the cost per treated patient in the first year across all four conditions was 102% for adalimumab and 108% for infliximab. Newer BRMs had costs relative to etanercept that were 90% to 102% for rheumatoid arthritis, 132% for psoriasis, 100% for psoriatic arthritis, and 94% for ankylosing spondylitis.

LIMITATIONS

Potential study limitations were the lack of clinical information (e.g., disease severity, treatment outcomes) or indirect costs, the inability to compare costs of newer BRMs across all four conditions, and much smaller sample sizes for newer BRMs.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the BRMs that are approved for indications within all four conditions studied, etanercept had the lowest cost per treated patient when assessed across all four conditions.

摘要

目的

估算接受依那西普、阿巴西普、阿达木单抗、赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、利妥昔单抗或乌司奴单抗治疗的类风湿关节炎、银屑病、银屑病关节炎和/或强直性脊柱炎患者每人每年的生物调节剂(BRM)治疗费用。

方法

这是一项基于全国性理赔数据库的队列研究,纳入了 69349 例患有上述疾病且在 2008 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间有上述 BRM 理赔记录的商业保险患者(索引 BRM/索引日期)。第一年向支付方支付的 BRM 总获得和管理成本除以接受索引 BRM 的患者人数,计算出每位治疗患者的成本。依那西普被选为比较的参考药物。

结果

依那西普是最常用的索引 BRM(n=32298;47%),其次是阿达木单抗(n=20582;30%)、英夫利昔单抗(n=11157;16%)、阿巴西普(n=2633;4%)、利妥昔单抗(n=1359;2%)、戈利木单抗(n=687;<1%)、乌司奴单抗(n=388;<1%)和赛妥珠单抗(n=245;<1%)。以依那西普为参照,四种疾病中第一年每位治疗患者的成本阿达木单抗为 102%,英夫利昔单抗为 108%。与依那西普相比,新型 BRM 的成本在类风湿关节炎中为 90%至 102%,在银屑病中为 132%,在银屑病关节炎中为 100%,在强直性脊柱炎中为 94%。

局限性

研究的潜在局限性是缺乏临床信息(如疾病严重程度、治疗结果)或间接成本,无法比较所有四种疾病中新型 BRM 的成本,以及新型 BRM 的样本量小得多。

结论

在所研究的所有四种疾病的适应证中,依那西普是所有四种疾病中每位治疗患者成本最低的 BRM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验