• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[加利西亚老年中心认知与神经心理学评估应用的探索性研究]

[An exploratory study on the use of cognitive and neuropsychological assessessments in centres for the elderly in Galicia].

作者信息

Facal David, Mouriz Corbelle Romina, Balo-García Aranzazu, González-Abraldes Isabel, Caamaño Ponte Xosé, Dosil Díaz Carlos, Millán-Calenti José C

机构信息

Departamento de Psicoloxía Evolutiva e da Educación, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España; Grupo de Traballo sobre Avaliación Cognitiva e Neuropsicolóxica, Sociedade Galega de Xerontoloxía e Xeriatría (SGXX), España.

Centro Xerontológico A Veiga, Lugo, España; Grupo de Traballo sobre Avaliación Cognitiva e Neuropsicolóxica, Sociedade Galega de Xerontoloxía e Xeriatría (SGXX), España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2015 Mar-Apr;50(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.regg.2014.09.004
PMID:25443786
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive assessment is a fundamental tool in centres for the elderly when planning individualized care and intervention. The Galician Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (Sociedade Galega of Xerontoloxía and Xeriatría) has formed a Working Group on Cognitive and Neuropsychological Assessment, with the aim of studying the tools used and to identify the main challenges in this area.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An exploratory study was conducted via an online questionnaire with Sociedade Galega of Xerontoloxía and Xeriatría members between December 2013 and January 2014. It was completed by 49 professionals, of whom 26 were professionals in psychology and 10 medical doctors.

RESULTS

Consensus was found on the use of the MMSE as a screening tool, as well as the Global Deterioration Scale for dementia. There is a wide variation in the choice of general batteries of tests for the assessment of dementia (CAMCOG-R, ADAS-Cog, abbreviated Barcelona Test), and of the use of specific tests and a severe impairment battery.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of bias in the sector is suggested, with a high percentage of general practitioners using a few tools, and a small percentage using a large number of specific tools. The need for a consensus is stressed in order to facilitate assessment, objectify training needs, maximize the relationship between assessment and cognitive intervention, and provide tools to assess change.

摘要

引言

认知评估是老年护理中心制定个性化护理和干预计划时的一项基本工具。加利西亚老年医学与老年病学协会(Sociedade Galega of Xerontoloxía and Xeriatría)成立了认知与神经心理学评估工作组,旨在研究所使用的工具,并确定该领域的主要挑战。

材料与方法

2013年12月至2014年1月期间,通过在线问卷对加利西亚老年医学与老年病学协会的成员进行了一项探索性研究。49名专业人员完成了问卷,其中26名是心理学专业人员,10名是医生。

结果

在将简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)用作筛查工具以及使用痴呆症总体衰退量表方面达成了共识。在用于评估痴呆症的一般测试组合(剑桥认知检查表修订版(CAMCOG-R)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知部分(ADAS-Cog)、简化巴塞罗那测试)的选择上,以及在特定测试和严重损伤组合的使用上,存在很大差异。

结论

该领域存在偏差风险,很大比例的全科医生使用少数几种工具,而小比例的医生使用大量特定工具。强调需要达成共识,以促进评估、明确培训需求、最大化评估与认知干预之间的关联,并提供评估变化的工具。

相似文献

1
[An exploratory study on the use of cognitive and neuropsychological assessessments in centres for the elderly in Galicia].[加利西亚老年中心认知与神经心理学评估应用的探索性研究]
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2015 Mar-Apr;50(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
2
Screening of mild cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults--a multistage validation of the Chinese abbreviated mild cognitive impairment test.中国老年人轻度认知障碍的筛查——中文版简易轻度认知障碍测试的多阶段验证
Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):6-12. doi: 10.1159/000113300. Epub 2008 Jan 17.
3
Accuracy of the Brazilian version of the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly at screening for dementia in community-dwelling elderly participants: findings from FIBRA-RJ study.巴西版老年人认知功能下降知情者问卷在社区居住老年参与者痴呆筛查中的准确性:来自FIBRA-RJ研究的结果
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Sep;27(3):212-9. doi: 10.1177/0891988714524626. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
4
Improving the accuracy and precision of cognitive testing in mild dementia.提高轻度痴呆症认知测试的准确性和精密度。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Mar;18(2):314-22. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711001755. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
5
The need for a consensus in the use of assessment tools for Alzheimer's disease: the Feasibility Study (assessment tools for dementia in Alzheimer Centres across Europe), a European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium's (EADC) survey.阿尔茨海默病评估工具使用达成共识的必要性:可行性研究(欧洲各地阿尔茨海默病中心的痴呆评估工具),欧洲阿尔茨海默病协会(EADC)的一项调查。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;20(8):744-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.1355.
6
[Use of the Mini-Cog test as a screening method for dementia in the Italian population: the Argento Study results].[使用简易认知筛查量表(Mini-Cog)作为意大利人群痴呆症筛查方法:阿根廷研究结果]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2006 Mar-Apr;62(2):159-72.
7
Validation of the Spanish version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for diagnosing dementia.用于诊断痴呆症的西班牙文版阿登布鲁克认知检查III的验证
Neurologia. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(9):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Should the mini-mental state examination be retired?简易精神状态检查表应该停用吗?
Neurologia. 2014 Oct;29(8):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
9
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Geriatrics.老年病学中的认知障碍筛查。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2018 Nov;34(4):515-536. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.06.004.
10
Screening for cognitive impairment in an elderly veteran population: acceptability and results using different versions of the Mini-Cog.在老年退伍军人人群中筛查认知障碍:使用 Mini-Cog 的不同版本的可接受性和结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Feb;59(2):309-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03249.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in rural and urban areas in Cuba and factors influencing on its occurrence: epidemiological cross-sectional protocol.古巴农村和城市地区阿尔茨海默病的患病率及其发病影响因素的流行病学横断面研究方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):e052704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052704.
2
Dementia and Challenging Behaviors in Gerontological Centers. A Case Report.老年护理中心的痴呆症与挑战性行为。病例报告。
Geriatrics (Basel). 2019 Jan 22;4(1):15. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics4010015.