Beidel Deborah C, Alfano Candice A, Kofler Michael J, Rao Patricia A, Scharfstein Lindsay, Wong Sarver Nina
Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 Dec;28(8):908-18. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) impacts social, occupational and academic functioning. Although many interventions report change in social distress, improvement in social behavior remains under-addressed. This investigation examined the additive impact of social skills training (SST) for the treatment of SAD.
Using a sample of 106 adults who endorsed SAD across numerous social settings, participants were randomized to exposure therapy (imaginal and in vivo) alone, a combination of SST and exposure therapy known as Social Effectiveness Therapy (SET), or a wait list control. The assessment strategy included self-report measures, blinded clinical ratings and blinded assessment of social behavior.
Both interventions significantly reduced distress in comparison to the wait list control and at post-treatment, 67% of patients treated with SET and 54% of patients treated with exposure therapy alone no longer met diagnostic criteria for SAD, a difference that was not statistically significant. When compared to exposure therapy alone, SET produced superior outcomes (p<.05) on measures of social skill and general clinical status. In addition to statistical significance, participants treated with SET or exposure reported clinically significant decreases on two measures of self-reported social anxiety and several measures of observed social behavior (all ps<.05).
Both interventions produced efficacious treatment outcome, although SET may provide additional benefit on measures of social distress and social behavior.
社交焦虑障碍(SAD)会影响社交、职业和学业功能。尽管许多干预措施报告了社交痛苦方面的变化,但社交行为的改善仍未得到充分解决。本研究考察了社交技能训练(SST)对社交焦虑障碍治疗的附加影响。
选取106名在多种社交场合都认可患有社交焦虑障碍的成年人作为样本,将参与者随机分为仅接受暴露疗法(想象暴露和现场暴露)组、社交技能训练与暴露疗法相结合的社交效能疗法(SET)组或等待名单对照组。评估策略包括自我报告测量、盲法临床评分和社交行为的盲法评估。
与等待名单对照组相比,两种干预措施均显著降低了痛苦程度,且在治疗后,接受社交效能疗法治疗的患者中有67%、仅接受暴露疗法治疗的患者中有54%不再符合社交焦虑障碍的诊断标准,这一差异无统计学意义。与仅接受暴露疗法相比,社交效能疗法在社交技能和一般临床状况测量方面产生了更好的结果(p<0.05)。除了具有统计学意义外,接受社交效能疗法或暴露疗法治疗的参与者在两项自我报告的社交焦虑测量指标和多项观察到的社交行为测量指标上均有临床显著下降(所有p<0.05)。
两种干预措施均产生了有效的治疗结果,尽管社交效能疗法可能在社交痛苦和社交行为测量方面提供额外益处。