Compton Scott N, Peris Tara S, Almirall Daniel, Birmaher Boris, Sherrill Joel, Kendall Phillip C, March John S, Gosch Elizabeth A, Ginsburg Golda S, Rynn Moira A, Piacentini John C, McCracken James T, Keeton Courtney P, Suveg Cynthia M, Aschenbrand Sasha G, Sakolsky Dara, Iyengar Satish, Walkup John T, Albano Anne Marie
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Apr;82(2):212-24. doi: 10.1037/a0035458. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
We sought to examine predictors and moderators of treatment outcomes among 488 youths ages 7-17 years (50% female; 74% ≤ 12 years) meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., text rev.; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) criteria for diagnoses of separation anxiety disorder, social phobia, or generalized anxiety disorder who were randomly assigned to receive either cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), sertraline (SRT), their combination (COMB), or medication management with pill placebo (PBO) in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study (CAMS).
Six classes of predictor and moderator variables (22 variables) were identified from the literature and examined using continuous (Pediatric Anxiety Ratings Scale; PARS) and categorical (Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement; CGI-I) outcome measures.
Three baseline variables predicted better outcomes (independent of treatment condition) on the PARS, including low anxiety severity (as measured by parents and independent evaluators) and caregiver strain. No baseline variables were found to predict Week 12 responder status (CGI-I). Participants' principal diagnosis moderated treatment outcomes but only on the PARS. No baseline variables were found to moderate treatment outcomes on Week 12 responder status (CGI-I).
Overall, anxious children responded favorably to CAMS treatments. However, having more severe and impairing anxiety, greater caregiver strain, and a principal diagnosis of social phobia were associated with less favorable outcomes. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
我们试图在488名年龄在7至17岁之间(50%为女性;74%年龄小于等于12岁)符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版,修订版;美国精神病学协会,2000年)中分离焦虑障碍、社交恐惧症或广泛性焦虑障碍诊断标准的青少年中,研究治疗结果的预测因素和调节因素。这些青少年在儿童/青少年焦虑多模式研究(CAMS)中被随机分配接受认知行为疗法(CBT)、舍曲林(SRT)、二者联合治疗(COMB)或药物管理加安慰剂(PBO)治疗。
从文献中确定了六类预测因素和调节因素变量(共22个变量),并使用连续性(儿童焦虑评定量表;PARS)和分类性(临床总体印象量表-改善;CGI-I)结果测量指标进行研究。
三个基线变量预测了在PARS上更好的结果(与治疗条件无关),包括低焦虑严重程度(由父母和独立评估者测量)和照料者压力。未发现基线变量能预测第12周的反应者状态(CGI-I)。参与者的主要诊断对治疗结果有调节作用,但仅在PARS上。未发现基线变量对第12周反应者状态(CGI-I)的治疗结果有调节作用。
总体而言,焦虑儿童对CAMS治疗反应良好。然而,焦虑更严重且功能受损、照料者压力更大以及主要诊断为社交恐惧症与较差的结果相关。讨论了这些发现的临床意义。