Wong Stuart J, Moughan Jennifer, Meropol Neal J, Anne Pramila Rani, Kachnic Lisa A, Rashid Asif, Watson James C, Mitchell Edith P, Pollock Jondavid, Lee R Jeffrey, Haddock Michael, Erickson Beth A, Willett Christopher G
Medical College of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.031. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
To report secondary efficacy endpoints of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 0247, primary endpoint analysis of which demonstrated that preoperative radiation therapy (RT) with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin achieved a pathologic complete remission prespecified threshold (21%) to merit further study, whereas RT with capecitabine plus irinotecan did not (10%).
A randomized, phase 2 trial evaluated preoperative RT (50.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) with 2 concurrent chemotherapy regimens: (1) capecitabine (1200 mg/m(2)/d Monday-Friday) plus irinotecan (50 mg/m(2)/wk × 4); and (2) capecitabine (1650 mg/m(2)/d Monday-Friday) plus oxaliplatin (50 mg/m(2)/wk × 5) for clinical T3 or T4 rectal cancer. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after chemoradiation, then 4 to 6 weeks later, adjuvant chemotherapy (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2); leucovorin 400 mg/m(2); 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2); 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks × 9. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated univariately by the Kaplan-Meier method. Local-regional failure (LRF), distant failure (DF), and second primary failure (SP) were estimated by the cumulative incidence method. No statistical comparisons were made between arms because each was evaluated individually.
A total of 104 patients (median age, 57 years) were treated; characteristics were similar for both arms. Median follow-up for RT with capecitabine/irinotecan arm was 3.77 years and for RT with capecitabine/oxaliplatin arm was 3.97 years. Four-year DFS, OS, LRF, DF, and SP estimates for capecitabine/irinotecan arm were 68%, 85%, 16%, 24%, and 2%, respectively. The 4-year DFS, OS, LRF, DF, and SP failure estimates for capecitabine/oxaliplatin arm were 62%, 75%, 18%, 30%, and 6%, respectively.
Efficacy results for both arms are similar to other reported studies but suggest that pathologic complete remission is an unsuitable surrogate for traditional survival metrics of clinical outcome. Although it remains uncertain whether the addition of a second cytotoxic agent enhances the effectiveness of fluorouracil plus RT, these results suggest that further study of irinotecan may be warranted.
报告放射治疗肿瘤学组0247方案的次要疗效终点,该方案的主要终点分析表明,术前放疗(RT)联合卡培他滨加奥沙利铂达到了预设的病理完全缓解阈值(21%),值得进一步研究,而RT联合卡培他滨加伊立替康则未达到该阈值(10%)。
一项随机2期试验评估了术前放疗(50.4 Gy,每次1.8 Gy)联合2种同步化疗方案:(1)卡培他滨(1200 mg/m²/d,周一至周五)加伊立替康(50 mg/m²/周×4);(2)卡培他滨(1650 mg/m²/d,周一至周五)加奥沙利铂(50 mg/m²/周×5),用于临床T3或T4期直肠癌。放化疗后4至8周进行手术,然后在4至6周后,每2周进行1次辅助化疗(奥沙利铂85 mg/m²;亚叶酸钙400 mg/m²;5-氟尿嘧啶400 mg/m²;5-氟尿嘧啶2400 mg/m²),共9次。采用Kaplan-Meier法单因素估计无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用累积发病率法估计局部区域复发(LRF)、远处转移(DF)和第二原发性肿瘤(SP)。未对两组进行统计学比较,因为每组是单独评估的。
共治疗104例患者(中位年龄57岁);两组患者特征相似。卡培他滨/伊立替康组放疗的中位随访时间为3.77年,卡培他滨/奥沙利铂组放疗的中位随访时间为3.97年。卡培他滨/伊立替康组的4年DFS、OS、LRF、DF和SP估计值分别为68%、85%、16%、24%和2%。卡培他滨/奥沙利铂组的4年DFS、OS、LRF、DF和SP失败估计值分别为62%、75%、18%、30%和6%。
两组的疗效结果与其他报道的研究相似,但表明病理完全缓解不适用于作为临床结局传统生存指标的替代指标。虽然添加第二种细胞毒性药物是否能增强氟尿嘧啶加放疗的疗效仍不确定,但这些结果表明可能有必要对伊立替康进行进一步研究。