Allegra Carmen J, Yothers Greg, O'Connell Michael J, Beart Robert W, Wozniak Timothy F, Pitot Henry C, Shields Anthony F, Landry Jerome C, Ryan David P, Arora Amit, Evans Lisa S, Bahary Nathan, Soori Gamini, Eakle Janice F, Robertson John M, Moore Dennis F, Mullane Michael R, Marchello Benjamin T, Ward Patrick J, Sharif Saima, Roh Mark S, Wolmark Norman
NRG Oncology/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA (CJA, GY, MJO, RWB, TFW, HCP, AFS, JCL, DPR, AA, LSE, NB, GS, JFE, JMR, DFMJr, MRM, BTM, PJW, SS, MSR, NW); Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL (CJA); NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA (GY); Glendale Memorial Hospital, Glendale, CA (RWB); CCOP Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE (TFW); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (HCP); Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI and SWOG, San Antonio, TX (AFS); Emory University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA and ECOG/ACRIN, Rochester, MN (JCL); Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and the ALLIANCE, Boston, MA (DPR); Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA (AA); Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC (LSE); University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (NB); Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium CCOP, Omaha, NE (GS); Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL (JFE); Beaumont Hospital System, Royal Oak, MI (JMR); Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS (DFMJr); Stroger Hospital Chicago MU-NCORP, Chicago, IL (MRM); Montana Cancer Consortium, Billings, MT (BTM); Oncology and Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH (PJW); UF Health Cancer Center, Orlando FL (MSR); Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA (NW).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv248. Print 2015 Nov.
National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project R-04 was designed to determine whether the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine could be substituted for continuous infusion 5-FU in the curative setting of stage II/III rectal cancer during neoadjuvant radiation therapy and whether the addition of oxaliplatin could further enhance the activity of fluoropyrimidine-sensitized radiation.
Patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiation were randomly assigned to one of four chemotherapy regimens in a 2x2 design: CVI 5-FU or oral capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin. The primary endpoint was local-regional tumor control. Time-to-event endpoint distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Among 1608 randomized patients there were no statistically significant differences between regimens using 5-FU vs capecitabine in three-year local-regional tumor event rates (11.2% vs 11.8%), 5-year DFS (66.4% vs 67.7%), or 5-year OS (79.9% vs 80.8%); or for oxaliplatin vs no oxaliplatin for the three endpoints of local-regional events, DFS, and OS (11.2% vs 12.1%, 69.2% vs 64.2%, and 81.3% vs 79.0%). The addition of oxaliplatin was associated with statistically significantly more overall and grade 3-4 diarrhea (P < .0001). Three-year rates of local-regional recurrence among patients who underwent R0 resection ranged from 3.1 to 5.1% depending on the study arm.
Continuous infusion 5-FU produced outcomes for local-regional control, DFS, and OS similar to those obtained with oral capecitabine combined with radiation. This study establishes capecitabine as a standard of care in the pre-operative rectal setting. Oxaliplatin did not improve the local-regional failure rate, DFS, or OS for any patient risk group but did add considerable toxicity.
国家乳腺与肠道外科辅助治疗项目R-04旨在确定在II/III期直肠癌新辅助放疗的治愈性治疗中,口服氟嘧啶卡培他滨是否可替代持续输注5-氟尿嘧啶,以及添加奥沙利铂是否可进一步增强氟嘧啶增敏放疗的活性。
接受术前放疗的临床II期或III期直肠癌患者按2×2设计随机分配至四种化疗方案之一:持续输注5-氟尿嘧啶或口服卡培他滨,加或不加奥沙利铂。主要终点为局部区域肿瘤控制。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计事件发生时间终点分布。从Cox比例风险模型估计风险比。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
在1608例随机分组的患者中,使用5-氟尿嘧啶与卡培他滨的方案在三年局部区域肿瘤事件发生率(11.2%对11.8%)、5年无病生存率(66.4%对67.7%)或5年总生存率(79.9%对80.8%)方面无统计学显著差异;在局部区域事件、无病生存率和总生存率的三个终点方面,使用奥沙利铂与不使用奥沙利铂也无差异(11.2%对12.1%、69.2%对64.2%、81.3%对79.0%)。添加奥沙利铂与总体及3-4级腹泻的统计学显著增加相关(P <.0001)。根据研究组不同,接受R0切除的患者三年局部区域复发率在3.1%至5.1%之间。
持续输注5-氟尿嘧啶在局部区域控制、无病生存率和总生存率方面产生的结果与口服卡培他滨联合放疗相似。本研究确立了卡培他滨作为术前直肠癌治疗的护理标准。奥沙利铂未改善任何患者风险组的局部区域失败率、无病生存率或总生存率,但确实增加了相当大的毒性。