Shuboni Dorela D, Cramm Shannon L, Yan Lily, Ramanathan Chidambaram, Cavanaugh Breyanna L, Nunez Antonio A, Smale Laura
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2015 Jan;138:75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Photic cues influence daily patterns of activity via two complementary mechanisms: (1) entraining the internal circadian clock and (2) directly increasing or decreasing activity, a phenomenon referred to as "masking". The direction of this masking response is dependent on the temporal niche an organism occupies, as nocturnal animals often decrease activity when exposed to light, while the opposite response is more likely to be seen in diurnal animals. Little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying these differences. Here, we examined the masking effects of light on behavior and the activation of several brain regions by that light, in diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats) and nocturnal Mus musculus (mice). Each species displayed the expected behavioral response to a 1h pulse of light presented 2h after lights-off, with the diurnal grass rats and nocturnal mice increasing and decreasing their activity, respectively. In grass rats light induced an increase in cFOS in all retinorecipient areas examined, which included the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the ventral subparaventricular zone (vSPZ), intergeniculate leaflet (IGL), lateral habenula (LH), olivary pretectal nucleus (OPT) and the dorsal lateral geniculate (DLG). In mice, light led to an increase in cFOS in one of these regions (SCN), no change in others (vSPZ, IGL and LH) and a decrease in two (OPT and DLG). In addition, light increased cFOS expression in three arousal-related brain regions (the lateral hypothalamus, dorsal raphe, and locus coeruleus) and in one sleep-promoting region (the ventrolateral preoptic area) in grass rats. In mice, light had no effect on cFOS in these four regions. Taken together, these results highlight several brain regions whose responses to light suggest that they may play a role in masking, and that the possibility that they contribute to species-specific patterns of behavioral responses to light should be explored in future.
(1)校准内部生物钟;(2)直接增加或减少活动,这一现象被称为“掩盖效应”。这种掩盖反应的方向取决于生物体所处的时间生态位,因为夜行性动物在暴露于光线下时通常会减少活动,而昼行性动物则更可能出现相反的反应。关于这些差异背后的神经机制,我们知之甚少。在此,我们研究了光对昼行性的尼罗多齿鼠(尼罗河草鼠)和夜行性的小家鼠行为的掩盖效应以及光对这两种动物多个脑区的激活作用。在熄灯2小时后给予1小时的光脉冲,每种动物都表现出预期的行为反应,昼行性的草鼠活动增加,夜行性的小鼠活动减少。在草鼠中,光诱导了所有检测的视网膜接受区中cFOS的增加,这些区域包括视交叉上核(SCN)、腹侧室旁下区(vSPZ)、间膝叶(IGL)、外侧缰核(LH)、橄榄顶盖前核(OPT)和背外侧膝状体(DLG)。在小鼠中,光导致其中一个区域(SCN)的cFOS增加,其他区域(vSPZ、IGL和LH)没有变化,而两个区域(OPT和DLG)的cFOS减少。此外,光增加了草鼠中三个与觉醒相关的脑区(外侧下丘脑、中缝背核和蓝斑)以及一个促进睡眠的区域(腹外侧视前区)的cFOS表达。在小鼠中,光对这四个区域的cFOS没有影响。综上所述,这些结果突出了几个脑区,它们对光的反应表明它们可能在掩盖效应中发挥作用,未来应探索它们对光的物种特异性行为反应模式的贡献。