Langel Jennifer, Yan Lily, Nunez Antonio A, Smale Laura
Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
J Biol Rhythms. 2014 Jun;29(3):192-202. doi: 10.1177/0748730414533289. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
Light not only entrains the circadian system but also has acute effects on physiology and behavior, a phenomenon known as masking. Behavioral masking responses to bright light differ in diurnal and nocturnal species, such that light increases arousal in the former and decreases it in the latter. Comparisons made within a species that displays both diurnal and nocturnal patterns of behavior may provide insight into how masking differs between chronotypes and the association between mechanisms controlling masking and the circadian drive for activity. Nile grass rats (Arvicanthis niloticus) provide a useful model for studying such issues because when these animals are housed with running wheels, some run primarily during day, while others run at night. Here we compared behavioral masking responses to 2-h pulses of light and darkness given across a 12:12 light/dark cycle in day-active (DA) and night-active (NA) grass rats. Both wheel-running activity (WRA) and general activity (GA) were monitored. Light pulses at night tended to increase both WRA and GA overall in the DA grass rats, while in NA grass rats, light pulses significantly reduced WRA but had no effect on GA. Dark pulses during the day tended to decrease both WRA and GA in the DA grass rats, while in the NA grass rats, they tended to increase WRA in the early day but had no effect on GA overall. Next, we measured cFos expression within 2 brain areas potentially involved in masking, the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) and the olivary pretectal area (OPT), of DA and NA grass rats either sacrificed on a control night or after a 1-h light pulse at ZT14. In DA grass rats, light at ZT14 induced cFos in the IGL and OPT, whereas in NA grass rats, cFos levels in both structures were high at ZT14 and were not altered by a 1-h light pulse. Overall, these results suggest that masking responses to light and darkness are dependent on the chronotype of the individual and that the responsiveness of the IGL and OPT to light may depend on or contribute to the behavioral response of these animals.
光不仅能调节昼夜节律系统,还对生理和行为有即时影响,这一现象被称为掩盖效应。昼行性和夜行性物种对强光的行为掩盖反应有所不同,即光会增加前者的觉醒程度,而降低后者的觉醒程度。在一个同时表现出昼行和夜行行为模式的物种内部进行比较,可能有助于深入了解不同生物钟类型的掩盖效应差异,以及控制掩盖效应的机制与昼夜活动驱动之间的关联。尼罗河草鼠(Arvicanthis niloticus)为研究此类问题提供了一个有用的模型,因为当这些动物被安置有跑轮时,一些主要在白天活动,而另一些则在夜间活动。在此,我们比较了在12:12的明/暗周期中,给予昼行性(DA)和夜行性(NA)草鼠2小时的光脉冲和暗脉冲后的行为掩盖反应。同时监测了跑轮活动(WRA)和一般活动(GA)。夜间的光脉冲总体上倾向于增加DA草鼠的WRA和GA,而在NA草鼠中,光脉冲显著降低了WRA,但对GA没有影响。白天的暗脉冲倾向于降低DA草鼠的WRA和GA,而在NA草鼠中,它们在白天早期倾向于增加WRA,但对GA总体上没有影响。接下来,我们测量了在控制夜间或在ZT14给予1小时光脉冲后处死的DA和NA草鼠的2个可能参与掩盖效应的脑区,即膝间小叶(IGL)和橄榄顶盖前区(OPT)内的cFos表达。在DA草鼠中,ZT14的光诱导了IGL和OPT中的cFos表达,而在NA草鼠中,这两个结构中的cFos水平在ZT14时较高,并且未因1小时的光脉冲而改变。总体而言,这些结果表明,对光和暗的掩盖反应取决于个体的生物钟类型,并且IGL和OPT对光的反应性可能取决于或促成这些动物的行为反应。