Whitten Robert B, Levitan Marc E
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
A common critique of using thermoplasticized carrier-based obturators is the incidence of overextension. It would be of benefit to clinicians to have a technique for canal preparation that would allow for predictable length control. This study compared straight canals instrumented to a size 40 file using a 0.04 standardized taper preparation (STP) and a varied taper preparation (VTP) by evaluating the extension of GuttaCore (GC) obturators (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK).
Eighty extracted mature human premolars with single straight canals were randomly divided into 2 experimental groups (n = 40). The STP group was instrumented to size 40/.04 at the working length (WL). The VTP group was instrumented to size 40/.02 at the WL. Both groups were obturated with a size 40 GC obturator. Extension of the material, in relation to the WL, was evaluated and assessed ordinally. Statistically significant differences were determined by a 2-group chi-square test with a 2-sided P value set at P = .05 and a Fisher exact test of equal proportions.
Significant differences in extrusion existed between the STP and VTP groups when controlling for the type of apical preparation (P = .0005). The STP group resulted in a 47.2% incidence of overextension, whereas the VTP group resulted in 10.5% overextension of obturating material.
The results indicate that when filling straight canals with GC obturators the canal can be instrumented using a varied tapered canal preparation with a low likelihood of overextension.
对使用热塑性载体型封闭剂的一个常见批评是超充的发生率。对于临床医生来说,拥有一种能实现可预测长度控制的根管预备技术将大有裨益。本研究通过评估GuttaCore(GC)封闭剂(登士柏图尔萨牙科公司,图尔萨,俄克拉何马州)的超充情况,比较了使用0.04标准锥度预备(STP)和可变锥度预备(VTP)将直根管预备到40号锉的情况。
80颗拔除的具有单一直根管的成熟人类前磨牙被随机分为2个实验组(n = 40)。STP组在工作长度(WL)处预备到40/.04号。VTP组在WL处预备到40/.02号。两组均用40号GC封闭剂进行充填。评估并按顺序评定材料相对于WL的超充情况。通过双侧P值设定为P = .05的两组卡方检验和等比例的Fisher精确检验确定统计学上的显著差异。
在控制根尖预备类型时,STP组和VTP组之间的超充存在显著差异(P = .0005)。STP组超充发生率为47.2%,而VTP组封闭材料超充率为10.5%。
结果表明,当用GC封闭剂充填直根管时,可采用可变锥度的根管预备,超充可能性较低。