Spijker-Huiges Antje, Vermeulen Karin, Winters Jan C, van Wijhe Marten, van der Meer Klaas
Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
To investigate the effect of adding segmental epidural steroid injections (SESIs) to usual care compared with usual care alone on quality of life and cost utility in lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) in general practice.
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Results were analyzed using mixed models.
Primary care.
Patients (N=50) in the acute phase of LRS.
One epidural injection containing 80mg of triamcinolone in normal saline.
Back pain at 4 weeks after the start of the treatment.
Both groups experienced a significant increase in quality of life in (especially) the physical domains of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. The intervention group scored significantly better than the control group at certain time points in the physical domain. The differences were small. The cost-utility analysis showed that with a negligible loss of utility (3d in perfect health), societal costs (193,354 euros per quality-adjusted life year lost) would be saved because of more productivity in the intervention group.
Although the beneficial effects of SESIs are small and the natural course of LRS is predominantly favorable, we think decision makers can consider implementing SESIs in daily practice with the purpose of saving resources. Caution must be taken, and further research should be directed at identifying patient subgroups who might benefit from SESIs, with additional focus on (costs of) complications and adverse effects.
在普通医疗中,研究与单纯常规护理相比,增加节段性硬膜外类固醇注射(SESIs)对腰骶神经根综合征(LRS)患者生活质量和成本效益的影响。
一项实用的随机对照试验。使用混合模型分析结果。
初级医疗保健机构。
LRS急性期患者(N = 50)。
一次硬膜外注射,含80mg曲安奈德于生理盐水中。
治疗开始后4周的背痛情况。
两组在(尤其是)医学结局研究简明健康调查36项问卷的身体领域方面,生活质量均显著提高。干预组在身体领域的某些时间点得分显著高于对照组。差异较小。成本效益分析表明,干预组因生产力提高,效用损失可忽略不计(相当于完全健康状态下损失3天),可节省社会成本(每损失一个质量调整生命年节省193,354欧元)。
虽然SESIs的有益效果较小,且LRS的自然病程大多良好,但我们认为决策者可考虑在日常实践中实施SESIs以节省资源。必须谨慎行事,进一步研究应致力于确定可能从SESIs中获益的患者亚组,并特别关注并发症和不良反应(的成本)。